Wulfharth[]
Excuse me, but there is something I can't understand. You see there is written in article that Wulfharth led nords in the battle of Red Mountain in 1E 416, right? But it seems that he lived much later, didn't he? He was chosen as a king of Skyrim only in 1E 480 Mortemus (talk) 13:48, May 16, 2019 (UTC)
- I believe that you are correct and have updated the article accordingly. I suspect that an editor became confused with Wulfharth's involvement after the War of Succession as described in The Five Songs of King Wulfharth. Please feel free to correct such things on your own in the future! —Atvelonis (talk) 15:13, May 21, 2019 (UTC)
assasination? demonstration, more like![]
is currently says in the main page, (by the way, bosmers' assasination ( s' ) is correct for a group-verb, not ( 's ))
" The reason for the Bosmer's assassination was that ... "
I reckon, that if the amount of dependency on Y'ffre's role inamongst the earth bones critical forming of Mundus, unlike what one might assume was all done&dusted of Lokhan's deed and the subsequent sacrifice of him, is a lot MORE than one realises ;..
...then isn't obvious?.. that a Nordic king turning up in the very place where respect for Y'ffres burden should be respected & whilst the 'unification' fallacy/dream is used as an excuse for conquest...
...is possibly reason-enough, to assume or at least postulate ;
That he was not assassinated per intruige of any mortals, but stepping on ground too neglected, too forgotten-about by mortal feet, you might say, SORE 'bones', spitting dirt, etc ... that,.. the reason for the timing of the hunt, may well've been not of any man or mer, at all?
And perhaps a action of if not only Y'ffre, then the Bosmer / allies / sympathetics to Y'ffre's burdern/suffering as well as he,.. all rejecting the lofty arrogance, and then morelike a REMINDER, or a demonstration,
of what mortals FORGET? Or i guess relatedly-to unification, that powers more powerful than most men can even imagine, are the determinants of which men/mer factions/temporary-powers rule, or dominate, etc?
That considering that even DURING, supposed unity, that clearly order is still a long way off, not to mention that unity isn't or HASn't, ever really been achieved?
Temporary promises are not proof of ESTABLISHED unity, etc.
just like established peace, or established reconciliation - it takes time, it cannot be forced.
Vurrath