FANDOM


Nominations/applicationsEdit

LoonixEdit

Nomination for Loonix. Successful.
User:Loonix

I nominate Loonix, who is usually two steps ahead of me when it comes to undoing vandalism. Loonix's contributions speak for themselves. (Originally nominated by Timeoin) --— Radical D (bother \ stalk) 23:23, December 17, 2011 (UTC)

+1 From me, obviously. --— Radical D (bother \ stalk) 23:23, December 17, 2011 (UTC)

Balagog gro-NolobEdit

Nomination for Balagog gro-Nolob. Successful.
Voting-support Support 16
Voting-neutral Neutral 0
Voting-oppose Oppose 0

Balagog gro-NolobTalkContribsEdit count

Vote closes on 10 August 2012 at 0:01 EST
I nominate Balagog because he is an exceptionally active user, and I cannot come online without him being on an editing spree. He has a very high reputation on this wiki, his rank being 10, but i have no doubt it will increase yet; he holds many achievements for being active. His attitude to the wiki is of a high quality, and he respects his duty to it. I am sure that he will be a great choice for a patroller. Alin Carter (talk) 18:50, August 3, 2012 (UTC)

SupportEdit

Voting-support Support – Although rank and achievements are no indication for if a person is suitable to be a patroller, I would still support Balagog as his recent work and attitude has been solid and he is very active on the wiki. Jimeee (talk) 18:56, August 3, 2012 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Balagog has been a great help on the wiki and he already fights vandalism everyday as it is. He would be a welcome addition as a Patroller. —TombRaiser SPEAK! 03:02, August 4, 2012 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Expanding on what Jimeee said, high edit counts and adherence to the wiki's style surely boosts one's case when applying for a staff position, but it is not required. What we need is a dedicated individual who is willing to ensure New Pages are up to stuff, one who ceaselessly scouts out and removes vandalism, and a friendly individual who is willing to point users towards policies and guide pages when they need help. I feel that Gog definitely fits the bill and am surprised we waited so long to nominate him. So long as he uses the rollback tools advantageously and continues to be an active editor and community member, I see no harm. --—Deyvid Petteys (bother \ stalk) 03:25, August 4, 2012 (UTC)

Voting-support SupportG0LD3NF1RE Questions Goes Here 02:34, August 5, 2012 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Nearly every time I go into the IRC I see him online, editing away, improving, fixing, adding, pointing out things that need fixed that he can't get at. That's the kind of spirit we need in a patroller. He has my vote. HaLo2FrEeEk Here I am! 02:37, August 5, 2012 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – I agree with the comments above. Balagog does seem to be on a great deal of the time making edits and catching vandals. I think he would be a good addition to the team. GramsJ (talk) 02:59, August 5, 2012 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Balagog would make an excellent Patroller, judging by his attitude towards keeping the Wiki as correct as possible, and his continuously active role on the Wiki. In my mind, it makes sense to make him a Patroller. Volknur (talk) 06:05, August 5, 2012 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Great personality, fights vandalism, productive editor, I see no reason not to make him one, as well as various reasons to make him a patroller, Mask2697 (talk) 00:21, August 8, 2012 (UTC)

Voting-support SupportFlightmare (talk) 23:04, August 6, 2012 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – I don't see why not. — Gleekobsessed 07:05, August 7, 2012 (UTC) {C}

Voting-support SupportElchzard (talk) 10:01, August 7, 2012 (UTC)

Voting-support SupportCommander Faol (talk) 11:31, August 7, 2012 (UTC)

Voting-support SupportRosenrot87 (talk) 17:23, August 7, 2012 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – His activity over the past months has been astounding, Balagog would be a great addition to the Patroller team. Dar'Rajhin (talk) 01:05, August 8, 2012 (UTC)

Voting-support SupportRaulfin Talk 05:17, August 8, 2012 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – - Senjai (talk) 05:48, August 8, 2012 (UTC)

CommentsEdit

Voting-comment Comment – I have noticed a distinct lack of people voting against any of these...—This unsigned comment is by Mask2697 (talkcontribs) . Please sign your posts with ~~~~!

Voting-comment Comment – Mask, this is the third time within two days that you haven't signed your comments. You know better. Please don't do it again, or we'll just remove your comments next time. Anyway, to answer your question, the editors can vote how they want. Most of us are agreeable, forgiving folk who like to give people chances. Besides, I see no reason why Balagog should not be a patroller, unless one is unwilling to forgive the whole, "Dar is a bot" business, which Gog has clearly graduated beyond. Certainly, I hope users aren't editing with the crowd to avoid conflicts etc. I would certainly vote "no" if I felt someone didn't deserve the tools. Most definitely. —This unsigned comment is by Deyvid Petteys (talkcontribs) . Please sign your posts with ~~~~!
Voting-comment Comment – Lol Deyvid, must be tired, but I'll take any chance to point out your flubs! Because they are once in a life time opportunities! *cackle* Senjai (talk) 05:50, August 8, 2012 (UTC) (Referring to your unsigning of this comment lol)

Jaymz6Edit

Nomination for Jaymz6. Successful.
Voting-support Support 9
Voting-neutral Neutral 0
Voting-oppose Oppose 0

Jaymz6TalkContribsEdit count

Vote closes on 15 August 2012 at 0:01 EST

Aside from Mask, GramsJ, and Loonix, I have not personally nominated many patrollers to the wiki. I prefer to nominate admins, or prepare my acolytes for adminship to the best of my ability. Having edited Wikia for over a year, I've also seen many editors come and go. It's difficult to find good eggs that stay past their "hatching". Bad food puns aside, I believe, given Jay's track record, that he would benefit from having the rollback tool. Not only for being a trusted user, but for being a valued contributor and excellent vandalism patroller. He has uploaded many gorgeous 3D renders of Oblivion armors, and given the current status of articles on games older than Skyrim, we could use more editors willing to edit those pages with text, item stats, and images. With the rollback tool, he could quickly keep those articles clean. Given the influx of edits that may appear as a result of Dawnguard being released on PC, and soon to be released on PS3, having another patroller could prove to be advantageous. Granted, we are already under-staffed as is. Of course, there is always The Elder Scrolls Online to prepare for as well. Allies could help us ensure a smooth release date.

Also, in the last week of June (as evidenced here and here), Jay was highly active as a vandalism patroller. Occasionally, even to the exclusion of the wiki's actual patrollers. Additionally, he has been a half-operator and a custodian on the wiki for several weeks now. He has employed these tools well, from what I have observed, and will only improve with time. I am willing to take him under my wing and form a sort of "Doom of Damocles " if need be.

SupportEdit

Voting-support Support – - As nominator. --—Deyvid Petteys (bother \ stalk) 05:42, August 8, 2012 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – - Agree with all points mentioned. Senjai (talk) 05:52, August 8, 2012 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – - Jaymz6 definitely deserves the role of Patroller. Dar'Rajhin (talk) 05:56, August 8, 2012 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – I knew he'd be nominated for Patroller eventually. We need more dedicated people on Staff. :) —TombRaiser SPEAK! 06:02, August 8, 2012 (UTC)

Voting-comment Comment – It was only a matter of time. :) --—Deyvid Petteys (bother \ stalk) 06:04, August 8, 2012 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – --Jimeee (talk) 08:09, August 8, 2012 (UTC)

Voting-support SupportCheatcodechamp (talk) 04:41, August 10, 2012 (UTC)

Voting-support SupportKennyannydenny (A question is never stupid, only he who asks it) 21:29, August 10, 2012 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – He is very helpful and really knows how this place works. — Gleekobsessed 23:23, August 12, 2012 (UTC)

Voting-support SupportBalagog gro-Nolob (The Gourmet is listening) 07:52, August 13, 2012 (UTC)

EbonySkyrimEdit

Nomination for EbonySkyrim. Successful.
Voting-support Support 6
Voting-neutral Neutral 0
Voting-oppose Oppose 0

EbonySkyrimTalkContribsEdit count

I nominate EbonySkyrim for the title of patroller. She has been with us awhile and she has been a help and pleasure the whole time. I have no doubt that she can handle this.

SupportEdit

Voting-support Support – As nominator-Cheatcodechamp (talk) 01:03, January 21, 2013 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – She's always friendly in her messages to users and has been very helpful all around. I believe she has what it takes to be a patroller. —TombRaiser SPEAK! 01:26, January 21, 2013 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Because #YOLO, also I think ebonyskyrim would be a decent candidate... Mask2697 (talk) 03:52, January 21, 2013 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Very hardworking and thoughtful, and living in a different time zone than most patrollers is a plus. --Shockstorm (talk) 04:07, January 21, 2013 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Constantly adding and improving pictures along with fixing articles, I think she'd be great. As Shockstorm said, a different time zone than others is also good. Kroq-gar78 (talk) 18:49, January 21, 2013 (UTC)

Voting-support SupportBalagog gro-Nolob (The Gourmet is listening) 23:28, January 21, 2013 (UTC)

Kroq-gar78Edit

Nomination for Kroq-gar78. Successful.
Voting-support Support 4
Voting-neutral Neutral 0
Voting-oppose Oppose 0

Kroq-gar78TalkContribsEdit count

I am nominating Kroq-gar78 for patroller. He's an active contributor in helping keep the wiki up to standards. He has shown the ability and understanding it takes to be a patroller as is already familiar with the proper way to revert and report vandals via the VIP. He also already knows about monitoring CVN via IRC.

SupportEdit

Voting-support Support – As nominator- —TombRaiser SPEAK! 19:23, January 21, 2013 (UTC)

Voting-support SupportBalagog gro-Nolob (The Gourmet is listening) 23:28, January 21, 2013 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – -it would be great to see him get the job, we need all the help we can get Cheatcodechamp (talk) 20:34, January 22, 2013 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Deserving and seems to be experienced with coding, and more patrollers would be helpful. --Shockstorm (talk) 00:09, January 23, 2013 (UTC)

AutoBloodEdit

Nomination for AutoBlood. Successful.
Voting-support Support 7
Voting-neutral Neutral 0
Voting-oppose Oppose 0

AutoBloodTalkContribsEdit count

Proved himself useful and we're pretty short-staffed. Give him the yellow, guys.

SupportEdit

Voting-support Support – As nominator. Elchzard (talk) 20:45, June 24, 2013 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Of course, I was wondering when this would happen. :) —TombRaiser SPEAK! 20:48, June 24, 2013 (UTC)

Voting-support SupportG0LD3NF1RE Questions Goes Here 20:54, June 24, 2013 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – 'bout time. Kroq-gar78 (talk) 21:27, June 24, 2013 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Of course. Jimeee (talk) 23:06, June 24, 2013 (UTC)

Voting-support SupportEbonySkyrim (talk) 21:27, June 28, 2013 (UTC)

Voting-support SupportBalagog gro-Nolob (The Gourmet is listening) 23:48, June 28, 2013 (UTC)

MHInfiniteEdit

Nomination for MHInfinite. Successful.
Voting-support Support 8
Voting-neutral Neutral 0
Voting-oppose Oppose 0

MHInfiniteTalkContribsEdit count

I am nominating MHInifite for patroller as he has been a very active member of this wiki and adding a lot of ESO content. He is also actively watching edits along the way, taking care of vandalism when spotted. Since he is already doing patroller-like tasks, I believe it would be beneficial to the wiki to promote him to patroller so he has the right tools for the job.

SupportEdit

Voting-support Support – As nominator. —TombRaiser SPEAK! 21:58, December 4, 2013 (UTC)
Voting-support Support – Agree —EbonySkyrim Message! 22:06, December 4, 2013 (UTC)
Voting-support Support – One of the best non staff editors here Crazy131(UTC)
Voting-support Support – Large number of quality mainspace and file edits, with a track record of anti-vandalism. --—Deyvid Petteys (bother \ stalk) 00:35, December 5, 2013 (UTC)
Voting-support Support – He will be a great addition to our wikia staff and does a lot of good work, including to the TESO pages. You're a great person to work with and thus I support you. Kennyannydenny (A question is never stupid, only he who asks it) 11:10, December 8, 2013 (UTC)
Voting-support Support – They have added more Online info than any other user and deserve this promotion. —AutoBlood Talk 14:41, December 8, 2013 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – For reasons stated above. —Sky Above,Voice Within · Show thy Voice! 19:27, December 8, 2013 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – He's a great editor, and definitely suited for the role of patroller, especially with regards to the Online pages. He's fixed my late night mistakes more than once (Sorry, MH!) TimeoinSay G'DayView my work 13:12, December 10, 2013 (UTC)

Sky Above,Voice WithinEdit

Nomination for Sky Above,Voice Within. Successful.
Voting-support Support 12
Voting-neutral Neutral 0
Voting-oppose Oppose 0

Sky Above,Voice WithinTalkContribsEdit count


I, 789Snowbird987, hereby nominate a Wikian known as "Sky Above, Voice Within" as Patroller. While we do not interact often, said user and I have dealt together before, in a matter concerning Character Sheets. I was new to the Wiki and had not Edited seriously, before, and as thus was unaware of said policy. Said user corrected me and taught me the correct way to use these "sheets". Said user can also be seen editing often and passing after others to ensure that no mistakes were commited. As such, I strongly believe that Sky Above, Voice Within would make an excellent Patroller. 789Snowbird987 (talk) 19:48, December 8, 2013 (UTC)

SupportEdit

Voting-support Support – As nominator. 789Snowbird987 (talk) 20:04, December 8, 2013 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Solid edit history and super helpful with new users and vandalism. Deserving of the yellow badge of honor. :) --—Deyvid Petteys (bother \ stalk) 20:11, December 8, 2013 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Reasons stated already. UAM (talk) 20:17, December 8, 2013 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Reasons stated above. Very good edit history. :) Flugsmith (talk) 20:22, December 8, 2013 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Very responsible with editing. Mania the Knight of Order (talk) 20:27, December 8, 2013 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Constantly on the look out for vandalism and fixes them right away,helpful on the forums and quite active.—This unsigned comment is by M.Owen LFC! (talkcontribs) . Please sign your posts with ~~~~!

Voting-support Support – I agree. Keep up the good work! :) —TombRaiser SPEAK! 06:13, December 9, 2013 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – He corrects my edits and he is very helpful but arrogant at times but he will defiantly be a great addition Crazy131

Voting-support Support – Same here.. —EbonySkyrim Message! 06:28, December 9, 2013 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – For reasons already stated. PLPellegrini (talk) 16:31, December 9, 2013 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – For reasons stated. Fire Wolf Pup (talk) 07:42, December 10, 2013 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – For the reasaons that people have said above already, but also for getting Deyvid to say "yellow badge of honour". TimeoinSay G'DayView my work 13:45, December 10, 2013 (UTC)

Crazy131Edit

Nomination for Crazy131. Unsuccessful.
Voting-support Support 8
Voting-neutral Neutral 0
Voting-oppose Oppose 6

Crazy131TalkContribsEdit count

Crazy always patrols the RC, reverts vandalism and unproductive edits consistently, reports things on the VIP or on admin talk pages. Whenever a user is violating style or policy guidelines, he lets them know on their talk page. He is already performing the duties of a patroller. Let's make him yellow. :) --—Deyvid Petteys (bother \ stalk) 20:32, December 10, 2013 (UTC)

SupportEdit

Voting-support Support – - Crazy is comitted to this wiki, his editing skills are improving, and his contributions speak for themselves. Knight of Camlorn (talk) 21:40, December 18, 2013 (UTC)Knight of Camlorn

Voting-support Support – - as nominator --—Deyvid Petteys (bother \ stalk) 20:32, December 10, 2013 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Crazy131 is very helpful in finding vandals and undoing their work. He's a nice person and I never had any problem with him in the Chat. I only think he could work on his Grammar. Also, he's already Admin to other two wikias. I think he'll be a good addition to the team. PLPellegrini (talk) 21:30, December 13, 2013 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – As already stated he patrols RC and finds vandalism so will benefit from the rollback tool. As for his editing and grammar I think he has improved already and don't see why he shouldn't be a patroller.
Balagog gro-Nolob (The Gourmet is listening) 03:44, December 14, 2013 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – For reasons stated above. The Seller of the Pickles, and the Guardian of the MudkipzHareMessageTurtles 03:24, December 19, 2013 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Has improved much, lately and has proven to be up to the job. 789Snowbird987 (talk) 03:30, December 19, 2013 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Crazy is very active in editing, and much more. Mania the Knight of Order (talk) 23:13, December 21, 2013 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – I think Crazy is good enough as he has been doing more reporting of vandalism than any other one of the Patrollers. He's a good candidated and so I throw him my support. LONG LIVE CRAZY! :D Ketick1998 (talk) 23:12, December 21, 2013 (UTC)Ketick1998

OpposeEdit

Voting-oppose Oppose – I don't think Crazy is experienced enough with the wiki at the moment to jump straight to Patroller. By his own admission he needs to improve his edits, and looking at his edit history I agree. His grammar is a weak point and will be an issue. While he does revent vandalism from time to time, he has only used the VIP page twice - if this is not used then admins won't always know about vandalism. These are duties expected of a patroller - the yellow name isn't a badge of honor or a pat on the back - it's a job (often a tedious one) with certain expectations. Failure to meet these expectations only hurts the wiki.

As for him letting other users know about policy, our records show he has posted on a total of six user talk pages and all of the users he has talked to are either admins or experienced users. Further investigation reveals these interactions are nothing like Deyvid has mentioned, rather they are further evidence that Crazy is too inexperienced at this point. Again, Grammar and punctuation is an issue on these. Lastly, he forgot to sign his post on his comment on this very page - a minor thing we have all done - but something a patroller should not really forget. Jimeee (talk) 21:52, December 10, 2013 (UTC)

Voting-comment Comment – Despite the qualms presented here, Crazy has shown significant improvement in regards to editing and talk page etiquette. I do believe the editor's incessant reporting of vandalism, unproductive editing, and UESP copyright violations far exceeds any other infraction or concern expressed here. --—Deyvid Petteys (bother \ stalk) 21:17, December 13, 2013 (UTC)

Voting-oppose Oppose – While you do spot vandalism that is only one of the duties of a patroller. One of the requirements to be a patroller (listed in the requirements) is to demonstrate good editing skills in compliance with the current policies and style guidelines. Almost all of the messages on your talk page are about the reversions of your edits, and repeated reversions about the same thing. I think once you have actually shown an improvement in your editing and following of the policies, that you may be suited as a patroller at another time. —TombRaiser SPEAK! 22:46, December 10, 2013 (UTC)

Voting-oppose Oppose – I agree with Jimeee and TombRaiser. You're work on finding vandalism is very good and I hope you'll not stop with the great work, but as Tomb already mentioned, being a Patroller is more then that. "Demonstrate superior editing skills in compliance with the current policies and style guidelines" I'm sorry but you don't comply with that (yet). Too much edits show your inexperience with our guidelines and the English language. Everyone makes mistakes, including us admins, but you've made many mistakes. I'm sorry I have to vote against you, please don't take it personal. I know you'll improve in the future and I will be there to support the nomination. Kennyannydenny (A question is never stupid, only he who asks it) 18:16, December 14, 2013 (UTC)

Voting-oppose Oppose – I agree that he has improved but he still misses a lot when editing and needs to improve and look through the edits more in my opinion. Just this morning I had to correct several articles where he had done edits in the past 24 hours. —EbonySkyrim Message! 10:00, December 22, 2013 (UTC)

Voting-oppose Oppose – From what ive seen and read here and his own edits, he is not yet ready for the job. Being a Patroller is hard work, and i dont think any of us where who have or have had the job where perfect, but when we where nominated, we where at a point where people knew we could handle the job, and im not seeing that kind of trust here. Crazy has helped on this wiki, but is not prepared for the job he is being nominated for.-Cheatcodechamp (talk) 05:01, January 2, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-oppose Oppose – I have changed my vote. I really thought you were going to improve your edits after your nomination, but this showed otherwise. I don't feel comfortable supporting your promotion until you show an actual improvement on the way you edit. —Sky Above,Voice Within · Show thy Voice! 03:13, January 4, 2014 (UTC)

CommentsEdit

Voting-comment Comment – - Yeah sky i sometimes have a problem with that but i'm going to try to improve my edits —This unsigned comment is by Crazy131 (talkcontribs) . Please sign your posts with ~~~~! 21:04, December 10, 2013 (UTC)

Alduin1996Edit

Nomination for Alduin1996. Unsuccessful.

Alduin1996TalkContribsEdit count

Hello. I want to nominate Alduin1996 for the position of Patroller.

I chose to nominate him for his experience in the Elder Scrolls Wiki.

I've seen him to be very helpful around here, and I've seen him ease tensions in certain threads.

In my opinion, I believe he would make a good Patroller. :) —This unsigned comment is by HumbleDaedricServant (talkcontribs) . Please sign your posts with ~~~~!

Also... I decided to nominate him because of his experience of easing or ending flame wars. HumbleDaedricServant (talk) 07:25, January 18, 2014 (UTC)

OpposeEdit

Voting-oppose Oppose – Sorry, but I'm not seeing productive edits. I see a lot of one word edits and removal of relevant information. Patrollers should strive for quality and productive edits. On more than one occasion you have removed interwiki links. Interwiki links belong in an article if the page has been created on an international Elder Scrolls Wiki. I don't think you are ready for a Patroller position right now. —TombRaiser SPEAK! 07:14, January 20, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-oppose Oppose – I agree with what Tombs has said. In addition, his activity on threads is not a factor when nominating a patroller, who works mainly in the mainspace articles. Jimeee (talk) 09:37, January 22, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-oppose Oppose – I agree a lot wih Tomb. Alduin1996 makes not only one word edits, but some of his edits can be considered harmful. Personally, I think he's badge hunting, and I think that he should be demoted from his position as moderator, much less becoming a patroller. User:Ned1230 Show thy AWESOMENESS!! 11:30, February 5, 2014 (UTC)</span>

NeutralEdit

Voting-neutral Neutral – I havent seen him Edit any Wiki Pages besides Forum posts. I'll change my Vote when he shows he can Edit. —This unsigned comment is by Ketick1998 (talkcontribs) . Please sign your posts with ~~~~!

Voting-neutral Neutral – He really doesn't edit pages enough for a type of job like this. Maybe if he starts editing more like Ketick said, I would support. Zippertrain85 (talk) 07:41, January 19, 2014 (UTC)

CommentsEdit

Voting-comment Comment – This comment is directed towards HumbleDaedricServant who nominated Alduin as having "experience of easing or ending flame wars" and "ease tensions in certain threads". This is what makes him a good moderator, not a good patroller. —TombRaiser SPEAK! 07:14, January 20, 2014 (UTC)

DarthOrcEdit

Nomination for DarthOrc. Unsuccessful.

DarthOrcTalkContribsEdit count


DarthOrc edits the pages frequently and seems to know what he/they are doing when it comes to editing. He also he/they seem to have knowledge of multiple Elder Scrolls games, such as Morrowind, Oblivion, and Skyrim. I honestly think he/they would be a great edition to the Patrollers. Zippertrain85 (talk) 17:44, January 21, 2014 (UTC)

NeutralEdit

Voting-neutral Neutral – DarthOrc, if they where more active, would be great for the job, but if there activity is minimal, they will need to spend more time on the wiki to made it worth them having the job, If they state that they can and will do the job, ill give them my support, but until then, im not sure i can vote either way.Cheatcodechamp (talk)

CommentsEdit

Voting-comment Comment – Zipper, did you ask them if they wanted to be nominated? Fire Wolf Pup (talk) 01:32, January 22, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-comment Comment – I was unaware they needed to be asked. If so, I will do that now. Zippertrain85 (talk) 01:38, January 22, 2014 (UTC)
Voting-comment Comment – I asked them, and they said it was okay. Zippertrain85 (talk) 04:51, January 22, 2014 (UTC)
Voting-comment Comment – And they also said they rarely spend much more than an hour and most of that may be devoted to a single edit. Patrollers are required to patrol the Recent Changes page. If this is of no interest to DarthOrc, then this nomination is invalid. --Jimeee (talk) 09:35, January 22, 2014 (UTC)
Voting-comment Comment – Allotted time has already passed for voting. —TombRaiser SPEAK! 23:05, February 6, 2014 (UTC)

Crazy131Edit

Nomination for Crazy131. Unsuccessful.

Crazy131TalkContribsEdit count

I nominate Crazy131 to be patroller. He seems to be pretty active on the wiki, and posts on users' talk pages. I think that he would make a good addition to the staff. User:Ned1230Ned1230 Show thy AWESOMENESS!! 11:30, February 5, 2014 (UTC)

SupportEdit

Voting-support SupportUser:Ned1230Ned1230 Show thy AWESOMENESS!! 11:30, February 5, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – I think that Crazy has made a lot of good edits on this Wiki, and is on the Mainspace articles often. He seems like Patroller material. I am Sylar (talk) 16:53, February 5, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-comment Comment – Crazy131 has already applied to be a chat moderator, and has successfully obtained that role. He can be nominated again at a later date, but if more nominations come too soon, they will not be accepted. See the archive above for the past nomination of Crazy131, which only happened just 2 months ago. —TombRaiser SPEAK! 23:05, February 6, 2014 (UTC)

FlugsmithEdit

Nomination for Flugsmith. Successful.

FlugsmithTalkContribsEdit count

I would like to nominate Flugsmith for patroller. He has been very helpful around the mainspace and has done more than simple one word changes. I've noticed him reverting vandalism when spotted, cleaning up pages, (more recently the Dark Brotherhood page), although it is preferred that many single edits weren't made in a short amout of time to the same page. But, other than that, I only see progress in improving articles on the wiki as well as taking a stand when new policies may need to be introduced or changed.

SupportEdit

Voting-support Support – As nominator —TombRaiser SPEAK! 23:04, February 6, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Sure. I myself interacted with him in the past, and he surely puts a good amount of work in the articles. —Sky Above,Voice Within · Show thy Voice! 00:20, February 7, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – He has helped me on many different occasions with how to edit, he's open minded, friendly, and understands how to edit well. I think he's right for this position. I am Sylar (talk) 00:40, February 7, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – I even wonder why he isn't a patroller yet. —This unsigned comment is by M.Owen LFC! (talkcontribs) . Please sign your posts with ~~~~!

Voting-support Support – Has a good track record of useful edits, and definitely seems up to the job. MHInf (talk) 13:41, February 7, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Reasons stated. Fire Wolf Pup (talk) 01:55, February 8, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – You know, I think Flugsmith still is patroller material, because he does show superior editing skills, and he also does seem to be a funny guy Ned Tp- Contribs

Voting-support Support – I agree —EbonySkyrim Message! 09:50, February 8, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – He acts like a patroller already anyways, & I think he is fit for it so it should be official. Ghost Anubis (talk) 11:13, February 9, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – I have yet to see any reason why Flugsmith should not be a patroller. I have even learned a few things from him, and he consistently upholds the standards of such a position and, quite frankly, I am surprised that this nomination has not occurred sooner, barring standard procedures. - Erik the Mad (talk) 00:18, February 15, 2014 (UTC)

Fire Wolf PupEdit

Nomination for Fire Wolf Pup. Successful.

Fire Wolf PupTalkContribsEdit count

I nominate Fire Wolf Pup as patroller, because she shows consistent edits and I believe she's patroller material Ned Tp- Contribs

SupportEdit

Voting-support Support – As nominator Ned Tp- Contribs

Voting-support Support – Fire Wolf Pup has done some great work in Vandalist catching and adding Morrowind pages. She also has a great history of useful editing. I reckon she has earned herself the Patroller title. > Flugsmith ~ talk // contributions ~20:01, February 7, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – I agree, she has done so much productive work here on the wiki. FWP is active in pretty much every part of the wiki; mainspace, fixing and creating new articles, and forums for Q&A about the games. —TombRaiser SPEAK! 21:49, February 7, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Reasons stated above. I am Sylar (talk) 22:09, February 7, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Does this mean I can apply for forum mod now FWP is a patroller? :P ℳ.Ѻẘεᾔ.ℒℱC Say Hi! stalk edits 02:03, February 8, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – I agree with her too —EbonySkyrim Message! 09:51, February 8, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Reasons already stated. Ghost Anubis (talk) 11:16, February 9, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Agreed. MHInf (talk) 16:55, February 9, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Agreed with the above statements Crazy131 (talk) 14:58, February 11, 2014 (UTC)

CommentsEdit

Voting-comment Comment – FWP is actually a she, and you need to sign your post so we know who you are. I am Sylar (talk) 00:41, February 7, 2014 (UTC)

FaceOfJanusEdit

Nomination for FaceOfJanus. Unsuccessful.

FaceOfJanusTalkContribsEdit count

Though he may not be showing off his skills, FOJ was nominated as MOTM in 2013, and still shows that he has superior editing skills, etc. Ned Tp- Contribs

SupportEdit

Voting-support Support – As nominator Ned Tp- Contribs

NeutralEdit

Voting-neutral Neutral – I haven't seen Janus really edit the amount that we would need for a Patroller, it's a job where you need to be on the Mainspace articles everyday. So, once the editing increases, I might change my vote. I am Sylar (talk) 17:12, February 9, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-neutral Neutral – FaceOfJanus has great fluctuations in activity and sometimes doesn't edit a few days at a time. As Zipper said, his activity must increase for me to change my vote. > Flugsmith ~ talk // contributions ~ 18:53, February 9, 2014 (UTC)

CommentsEdit

Voting-comment Comment – As there were not enough votes, it was not successful. —TombRaiser SPEAK! 23:16, February 15, 2014 (UTC)

Ghost AnubisEdit

Nomination for Ghost Anubis. Successful.

Ghost AnubisTalkContribsEdit count


I nominate Ghost Anubis to become a patroller. His edits have quality, he watches the recent changes, reports vandals, and points mistakes out to users. I can remember more than one occasion where the rollback tool would have been useful for him when undoing vandalism. He's already performing the duties of a patroller, so I see no reason in not making him one. We're certainly going to need more of us in the next weeks.

SupportEdit

Voting-support Support – As nominator. —Sky Above,Voice Within · Show thy Voice! 04:14, March 12, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Would be a very valuable asset to the team, he makes very productive edits, the most I've ever seen anyone do. He is outgoing and friendly, and has never been mean to anyone. Anyway, another very devoted member of the team would help, a lot. Ned Tp- Contribs10:16, March 12, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Ghost deserves to become a Patroller. Why? Because he works extremly hard on making articles better. One can say that he does even more than some of the current Patrollers, but that's just my opinion. AngryEnclaveSoldier (talk) 11:44, March 12, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Yes, absolutely. Ghost has made productive edits on Morrowind and online pages, reports vandalism and is very mature, he has my vote. ℳ.Ѻẘεᾔ.ℒℱC Say Hi! stalk edits 11:46, March 12, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – He has more than proven himself in my opinion. He's friendly, mature, and is always willing to help out those in need. He also made great edits in Morrowind. He has my full support. HumbleDaedricServant (talk) 11:53, March 12, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Reasons already stated. I was actually thinking about nominating him myself. Fire Wolf Pup (talk) 12:48, March 12, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – For the reason stated above, he's done a lot on the mainspace more than i've lol. There's no doubt in my mind he'd make a good patroller Crazy131 (talk) 14:06, March 12, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Could be a valuable asset to the patroller team. (talk) 14:12, March 12, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Great guy, makes very productive edits, I can't see why not. Zippertrain85 (talk) 14:41, March 12, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – All of the above. Most of his time on Wiki is spent Editing Wiki Pages. — KETIK Profile/Talk 17:10, March 12, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Yes. With the upcoming release of Online, another member of the team is needed. Flugsmith (talk) 17:23, March 12, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – I've seen his edits, also, the reasons above are unquestionably true. A Manic Monitor (talk) 20:28, March 13, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Full support here, definitely deserves the position of Patroller --Speysider Talk Page | Tabber Code | Channel 20:28, March 13, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – He certainly has grown in the past few weeks and it will be needed for the upcoming release of Online as mentioned. —EbonySkyrim Message! 22:48, March 13, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Totally agree with everyone above. Let's not hold this off any longer. :) —TombRaiser SPEAK! 23:12, March 14, 2014 (UTC)

Ghost AnubisEdit

Nomination for Ghost Anubis. Successful again.

Ghost AnubisTalkContribsEdit count


I'm nominating Ghost Anubis to be patroller again. He has had this position before but had to leave after some time, now he has been back for over a month and he is once again performing all requirements of a patroller and improving articles on Morrowind and The Elder Scrolls Online when he can. Giving him back the rollback tools will benefit us all.

SupportEdit

Voting-support Support – as nominator —EbonySkyrim Message! 08:55, August 24, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – We need more active patrollers and Ghost has greatly contributed to the articles, especially the Morrowind ones that need the most attention, he did good before he can do good again. I just hope he sticks around longer this time. --CHIM Shady (talk) 09:03, August 24, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Ghost has shown in the past, and still shows not only the skills we need from Patrollers, but the ability to do the job as well.-Cheatcodechamp (talk) 09:13, August 24, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – He's a great wiki contributor and previously was a patroller and did a great job for the wiki. There's no reason to oppose this, it's a no-brainer that he should be granted rollback and custodian flags again. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page | Tabber Code | Channel 09:16, August 24, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – As everyone knows, Ghost is a great editor. He put tons of work into the Morrowind pages. Plus, he already has experience of being a Patroller. There's no reason for him to not become a Patroller again. So yes, support. Pelinal Whitestrake (talk) 09:18, August 24, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Ghost's been a Patroller before and only had to leave for things which are already sorted. He's been heavily improving the Morrowind articles, which,let's face it, most users will never edit them. So support (obviously.) Legacyofhades (talk) 10:20, August 24, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Ghost is a great editor and has put in so much work with his edits. He definitely deserves to become a Patroller again. Fire Wolf Pup (talk) 11:13, August 24, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Ghost is a fantistic editor and deserves the post. The Wiki needs people who are interested in it's wellbeing. Zu'u lost daal. Alduin1996 (talk)

Voting-support Support – Ghost is an amazing editor and deserves another chance at patroller, He is one of the only one whos improve the morrowind articles (which makes the wiki look better as a whole, since we're not forgetting the older games) (leave the tin text it looks cute.) EmperorJohnson (talk) 12:45, August 24, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – After what he's done with the Morrowind articles, I say he deserves it. Not just those, but any more edit's hes done. He is active, and that is what we need. The demented Breton (talk) 13:08, August 24, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Per others. He defenitly deserves it !Emperor Jarjarkine Aldmeri Dominion Senate Hall 13:24, August 24, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Great editor, works hard on Morrowind articles and is always helpful. Deserves to be a patroller. Serve Akatosh or serve no one. (talk) 13:31, August 24, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – We could use you on the team, you've done great work. I fully support you. Kennyannydenny (A question is never stupid, only he who asks it) 13:40, August 24, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Ghost is an amazing editor and active contributor to the wiki. We need more patrollers, and Ghost is definitely the best choice. —Likes-That-Tail Message :) 13:54, August 24, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – You know, for a Wiki that has been lacking in quality editors lately, Ghost Anubis has been doing very well. Most times I look at the mainspace he is making good edits, reverting the poor ones, etc. I think he would do great for a Patroller and would be fantastic for the Wiki :). Lord Heisenberg of House White (talk) 14:28, August 24, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – There is definitely a lack of patrollers as of late and Ghost having been a patroller in the past is already familiar with the tasks. He's always been a very helpful member of the wiki and I believe he will continue to do a great job patrolling the wiki, editing, and assisting members just as he did from the beginning. —TombRaiser SPEAK! 17:53, August 24, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – History repeats itself as the worthy editor is nominated once more. His work deserves praise. —Sky Above,Voice Within · Show thy Voice! 20:47, August 24, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – He is well known in the community and from what I have seen, everyone goes to him for some kind of approval on what they are doing. He is very active and takes the time to help others. Even if some have a hard time understanding (like me). God's Army (talk) 22:50, August 24, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – He has helped edit a lot of pages lately, I would be happy to support him. --Greeno200 (talk) 17:04, August 25, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Brilliant editor, very nice to see him get the postion that he deserves back. ℳ.Ѻẘεᾔ.ℒℱC Say Hi! stalk edits 22:54, August 25, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – One of the most active members of the wikia, Finally getting what he deserves ~Jash

Voting-support Support – Ghost is a very nice guy and a very good editor. He helped TESwikia a lot before. I'm sure he can fulfill the responsibility of a patroller. SleepingIII (talk) 02:24, August 26, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Out of all the Patrollers and candidates to have ever been-- uh, candidated?--, Ghost is the most deserving — KETIK Profile/Talk 03:46, August 26, 2014 (UTC)

AtvelonisEdit

Nomination for Atvelonis. Successful.

AtvelonisTalkContribsEdit count

I'm nominating Atvelonis for the position of patroller because he has shown the ability to effectively edit articles here, watch for vandalism or bad edits. He has remained active, & consistently worked hard to improve this wiki. In addition he has shown an aptitude for learning & improving in how he does things. We have no active patrollers currently & I believe adding Atvelonis to the team would greatly benefit the wiki.

SupportEdit

Voting-support Support – As nominator. Ȼǿᵰᵮẽᵲ ₲ħǿśᵵ Ⱥᵰᵾᵬĭᵴ Đẽẽᵭᵴ 02:10, January 10, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – I've seen Atvelonis edit for a long time now and I have also seen he has grown, learned and improved on the way. No doubt he will be an addition to our patroller team. EbonySkyrim Message! 02:20, January 10, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Saw his stuff, looks like he could be a nice edition to the Mainspace:) Zippertrain85 (talk) 02:50, January 10, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – He has made very helpful edits on articles and has contributed regularly. I believe Atvelonis will make a great Patroller. --Greeno200 (talk) 19:44, January 10, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Atvelonis has made many edits that improve the wiki overall. I see no reason for him to not be granted the rollback and custodian flags. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page | Contribs | Channel 19:51, January 10, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – I agree with many of the above points, I think Atvelonis should be a Patroller. His edits have benefited the community in a very helpful way. ☞ Яǐɱ (Chat with Meh) (Updates) 05:39, January 16, 2015 (UTC)

The Rim of the SkyEdit

Nomination for The Rim of the Sky. Successful.

The Rim of the SkyTalkContribsEdit count


I'm nominating Rim for the position of patroller because he has shown the ability to effectively edit articles here, watch for vandalism or bad edits, much a patrollers job. He has remained active, & consistently worked hard to improve this wiki. In addition he has shown an aptitude for learning & improving in how he does things. We have no active patrollers currently & I believe adding Rim to the team would greatly benefit the wiki.

SupportEdit

Voting-support Support – as nominator EbonySkyrim Message! 05:24, January 16, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – I agree & was going to do this myself, he deserves it, good luck Rim! Ghost Anubis (talk) 05:29, January 16, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Rim has worked hard to improve the wiki in many aspects, and Patroller is definitely a position he deserves. Atvelonis (talk) 13:55, January 16, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – He makes many edits and we really need more patrollers. With the resignation of Ghost and Ebony, we're also going to need a new sysop to handle it all. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page | Contribs | Channel 13:57, January 16, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – We need more active leaders here, and this seems to be a logical move.-Cheatcodechamp (talk) 02:43, January 20, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support SupportEmperor Jarjarkine Aldmeri Dominion The Ragged Flagon - Cistern 02:50, January 20, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – He works really hard and has made many edits. Giving him this position will help the wiki a great deal. — Fire Wolf Pup (talk)  07:46, January 21, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Seems like a good fit :) Zippertrain85 (talk) 04:36, January 23, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Rim for Admin! But uh, I guess Patroller is suitable to. AIdmeri (talk) 04:54, January 23, 2015 (UTC)

SuperSajuukEdit

Application for SuperSajuuk. Successful.

SuperSajuukTalkContribsEdit count


I am applying to become a patroller. As pointed out in the other application, I was advised to apply for another staff position before sysop (which is incredibly pointless, but whatever), so here you go: am I suitable for patroller? I don't think I need to go through a list of why I should be one, I revert vandalism a lot and move pages (leaving redirects behind), I'm a very active community member and we have one patroller only, so yeah...

SupportEdit

Voting-support Support – I supported before, I'll do it again. congrats Spey! :) Zippertrain85 (talk) 14:49, April 9, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – I'm not typing out a whole explanation again, Saj meets all the requirements for this position and there is really no reason to oppose this promotion that I can see. Cosmicsilver (talk) 15:10, April 9, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support SupportSer Pouce-a-lot (talk) 15:18, April 9, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support –  Same, not typing my whole explanation again, I hate that nominations on this Wiki amount to nothing more than popularity contests, Sajuuk is great for the position, etc etc. DRAEVAN13Online ebonheart crest 15:30, April 9, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – I was hoping you'd get admin, but Patroller is the next best thing IMO. Best of luck to you, Your Brother in Arms (talk) 22:18, April 9, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – I really don't feel like writing yet another list of reasons why he should be patroller. But I'm gonna call out bluesonic once again with a quote You are too arrogant and will end up tearing this community apart are just typing things to type. What could spey possibly do with patroller Rollback to much move that page wrong LMAO. Really admin's are community leaders not patrollers so What harm could spey possibly do with patroller powers if your not aware WE only have one patroller who's only active as certain points of the day Spey isn't perfect but neither is any other user. Starkiller131 (talk) 23:19, April 11, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – If Admin has to be denied Spey due to popularity, then atleast give the man the Patroller position. As I stated multiple times before, he has the talent and the motivation to properly administrate this wiki. I'd also just like to point out to the user Bluesonic1 that Speysider has been a member of this wiki for well over a year, has during that whole time continuously contributed to it without this so-called "power hungriness" and was constantly reliable. Additionally, he has contributed great things to the community, as he is, like me and several other people, directly responsible for the unwanted, and indeed unqualified, staff - Jimeee, Kennyannydenny, etc - to have finally been pushed out of this wiki by the community. One can attribute most CT threads from the early- to mid 2014 directly to Spey, and if that doesn't show that he seriously cares for this wiki and it's state, I don't even know anymore. Pelinal the Whitestrake, the Bloody and Insurgent (talk) 08:42, April 11, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – I have stated before in the Admin application that while you may not be ready as an Administrator, you are certainly skilled in other respects. Your knowledge of coding and editing skill is very valuable to the wiki, and I think you can do wonders as a Patroller. Good luck! --Madman97 (talk) 02:10, April 12, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – I'll keep this short. You obviously have the skills needed for the job and the desire to perform. I think you'll continue to be a boon for the wiki.Gaminomicon (talk) 03:57, April 12, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Sajuuk didn't get the admin position, so now he's applying for the one below it. If that doesn't make sense, then what does? Who cares if he does it right away? It's not like he is required by law to meditate atop The Throat of the World for two years on his sins before he can apply again!

But wait - what's this!? The Elder Scrolls Wiki is being destroyed Godzilla-style by a rampaging cat! Oh no, how on Earth will we survive the chaos and destruction caused by the terrible power of the rollback tool? Surely this is the end of the world as we know it! D:

England prevails. Emperor Maximus (talk) 16:42, April 13, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – - Like I said in the other thread, I was against his proposal for the admin position, as some members of the community feel that he is not ready to do so. However, like I also said, I feel that he deserves a chance to show that he is truly deserving of a staff position - and all that it entails - being a role model and leader for the community, and wearing those yellow letters with pride; being mature and responsible; but more importantly - putting the community before ourselves always. That's what I expect from the Admins here - and those that do well in staff positions are those that all of those things. I believe he can DEFINITELY do all of these things. TimeoinSay G'DayView my work 11:11, April 15, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – I'm 100% done and tired with certain idiots opposing and getting angry when they are told to give a reason. This is maybe the third or forth time this year this shit has gone down, with no-reason opposes trashing it. It's all bias and unnecessary. Heads up- if you are reading this and even get slightly pissed at it, chances are you are one of the people this is specifically targeted at.

The same people, the same lack of reasoning. As a heads up, this is how you vote. Watching?

I believe SuperSajuuk has the ability and capability to hold the patroller position. He has shown respectability and wise choice making on his part throughout my nearly two years of knowing him, and has helped pull the wiki out of harder points in the past. His choices alone make him great enough to easily manage this position, with his passion for editing right behind it. Simply our best choice.

Did you learn something today? Can you feel your brain cells activating? Good, keep learning. Don't vote unless you fucking know how to. Happily signed by me, after two years of this retardation going on. ShawnHowellsCP (talk) 15:58, April 15, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – I have decided to vote for support for Sajuuk. I have seen that, even in the small amount of time on the wiki here, he does check for useless pages, and I have seen the pointlessness of every page so far. That may not be many as of right now, but I still feel that he has the ability to do the task at hand. As we are supposed to sign when we are done, well, you know. (I typed in in manually on wiki code since my regular code failed) User:Fghfghfgh510 17:48, April 15, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – You may dislike him. You may detest him. You may even abhor him -- but you can only recognize his value as a mainspace defender. After due consideration and reflection, it becomes clear and both Sajuuk and 131 merit promotion. ¢yn!k4l £@r7h (talk) 21:32, April 16, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – I supported the Admin app with my reasons, and now I'll support his Patroller app. Most of my reasons support this one, so I feel no need to restate them. President Polishman (talk) 20:31, April 17, 2015 (UTC)

NeutralEdit

Voting-neutral Neutral – Administrator and Patroller are two different things. I don't see you as a good candidate for Administrator, though I do see you as a good candidate for patroller. Still, I think some of your page moves should be talked over with administrator before you do them. I also encourage you not to "machinegun edit", when you fix 40 links at a time for hyperlinks it makes it harder for me to search through the wiki activity. I do think you should expand more on your application, you've hardly done much writing for it. I'm not voting neutral out of desperation for a fellow patroller, I'm voting because I do see potential but some issues that can be fixed/avoided in the future. ☞ Rim < Talk | Updates | Edits > 21:02, April 9, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-neutral Neutral – I am staying neutral with this vote. I opposed your administrator application as I don't believe you are entirely ready for the amount of community involvement that it comes with (even more so right now than at any other time; because of how few administrators we have currently, each one has to do a lot more in that regard), but patroller and administrator are quite different positions. Patroller is a lot more geared toward editing itself, which is something you are obviously good at, so I think this could work out okay. However, there are some reasons that I am not voting support. Firstly, I have very rarely seen you editing anything in the file namespace (categorization and adding templates and all that), which is one of the things patroller emphasizes. And additionally, unless you are marking them for deletion or something for whatever reason, I don't usually see you shaping up new pages, which makes me wonder if you will remain completely vigilant in that particular aspect of being patroller. I mean, if you do end up getting the position I assume you will start doing these things more often, but for now I will still stay neutral. —Atvelonis (talk) 04:40, April 12, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-neutral Neutral – -Sajuuk, while a good editor, has a mentality I do not agree with. For every person who says they like Sajuuk and think he should be staff, I have had another tell me they don't like him or his attitude. This isn't just a few people, and at some point I need to start asking what in the world is being done to anger or at least irritate these people. Sajuuk and I do not see eye to eye on much. I try to put my personal thoughts aside, but I can only do that so much and for so long. At this time, I do not trust Sajuuk or some of his methods. At this time however, I cannot fully say no to his application. Tim said he is closing this soon, so I trust that unless something happens soon, that he had made up his mind. I will trust him on this one and let him decide how this goes.-Cheatcodechamp (talk) 04:25, April 18, 2015 (UTC)

OpposeEdit

Voting-oppose Oppose – This is very unprofessional written compared to your other one, even if this is your second time making a application and it being a patroller application doesn't mean you should take it any less serious than a admin one. And after reading your comment on this thread, on the admin application we already mentioned disregarding rules, but now you are basically deciding conditions that prevent people from voicing their opinion. After reading this application and what i saw in Wikia chat earlier today about you still not being able to bury past problems of old staff makes me believe you are not ready for a staff position, even if i thought earlier that i was going to stay neutral this time. G0LD3NF1RE Questions Goes Here 18:49, April 9, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-oppose Oppose – My response to your admin application was long and detailed so I will refer back to that as to my reasons for why I feel you're not ready for a staff position. On top of that though, I need to add that it's coming across to the community very quickly that you are power-hungry for a staff position here. If that was not your intention, then I apologise, but perhaps it is useful to you that I point out what myself and others notice from the outside. You're a great editor, but still lacking in skills with the community. Your last application caused a ruckus, and you didn't waste any time starting a new application. It just doesn't look good to the rest of us, and certainly doesn't portray the level of maturity and neutral point of view that a staff member needs, nor do you stand as a good role model. After reading the first comment you added to this application, I feel even more strongly my choice in vote. You are too arrogant and will end up tearing this community apart. Bluesonic1 (talk) 00:06, April 11, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-oppose Oppose – Once again, I don't think Sajuuk is suitable for any staff role due to his imaturity. Same points I made in his failed admin application. Even this page shows his imaturity towards a normal discussion as he considers the whole process "pointless" and is arguing about colored names and wanting special exceptions for himself. He absolutely cannot handle and form of critisism as shown by his reply to Bluesonic and will write walls of text to prove himself. Even if he meets the Patroller guidelines, his attitude is terrible and Patrollers are supposed to be approachable. His work on this wiki only seems to be fixing links after a disambiguation page has been deleted. I would have expected a patroller to have done something more, but maybe this wiki is different.

User Pelinel Whitestrake wrote: "If Admin has to be denied Spey due to popularity, then atleast give the man the Patroller position.". This is probably the worst reasoning I have seen. Literally saying "He lost, so lets give him the loser prize as a consolation". And secondly, he lost the admin nomination not due to popularity, but due to his huge UNPOPULARITY. Half of the community said no! Vote failed. How else should it have been done? This alone speaks volumes about him. All this talk about how popularity contests are evil, its ironic that several of Sajuuk's friends are emphatically supporting evenything he says. Funny how that works eh?

In closing, TL;DR: No, not mature enough. Wulfharth (talk) 10:24, April 15, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-oppose Oppose – There are several important reasons why Sajuuk (aka Speysider) should not be in a position of power on the wiki. Here are the major ones:

  • Has tried to stifle any discussion that might reflect poorly on him, and attempts to remove anything that might be an impediment to him gaining user rights (see this, and also this discussion (among others), which he conveniently moved to his archive around the time discussion was taking place. Also insists on frequently discussing matters in pms in chat, which are not logged unlike talk or forum pages, and therefore cannot be held accountable for flaming, harassment, etc that he does there. Naturally does not like the idea of logging chat, and makes disingenuous statements to discourage any attempts to log chat in future (see here). This discussion also provides some background.
  • Repeatedly attempts to massively change the wiki based on his personal preferences (his argument being "[random wiki] does x, so we should too", or similar). Consistently condescending and aggressive to those with a contrary point of view, as demonstrated numerous times on talk pages and threads (example here). Attempts to close off discussion or voting by asking an admin he think might be sympathetic to do things for him.
  • Gratuitous personal attacks (here, here, here, here, among many others. Can also be seen in his recent requests to become Admin and then Patroller.
  • Repeated attempts to gain user rights, with or without consensus from the community. One can see that the only reason Sajuuk is applying as a Patroller is to get a stepping stone to admin powers. If he actually gained user rights, it would be a sort of fox guarding the henhouse situation, making the wiki worse off. Having a patroller or an admin who continuously violates policies (assume good faith, no personal attacks, etiquette, etc) won't be good for anyone.

I am no longer an editor here, so I have no personal stake in this discussion. I simply wanted to alert the community here about these things, as it would be unfair to them to not speak up, especially considering the great lengths that Sajuuk has gone to hide and distort the record. --Shockstorm (talk) 20:18, April 17, 2015 (UTC)

CommentsEdit

Voting-comment Comment – Unfortunately, I must give a pre-requisite for this one: I don't want to see people writing opposes on the basis of "You just applied for sysop and got denied, why are you obsessed in becoming a staff member?": if anyone writes such things, I will be contacting a sysop to remove the vote entirely as it will be interpreted as an attempt to stir up trouble. The same goes true for trying to oppose for something that happened at least a year ago for which you have zero evidence as these will be construed as deliberate vote fixing. Sorry folks, I have to point this out now, since it happened quite a bit in the previous application. --Sajuuk talk | contribs | Channel 11:19, April 9, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-comment Comment – I will respond to Rim's concerns:
I also encourage you not to "machinegun edit", when you fix 40 links at a time for hyperlinks it makes it harder for me to search through the wiki activity.
This is a common practice to fix links. You weren't around much when a user was spamming nearly 1000 link fixes in a single day, THAT is bad editing. Tim has also done mass link fixing all at once, but I'm not seeing anyone complaining to him about "flooding the feed". RC is a tool, if a lot of edits are being made, it just means the wiki is active. At least I'm doing it in batches and not flooding the feed.
I do think you should expand more on your application, you've hardly done much writing for it.
There isn't much for me to say about it. I already know about all the tools involved for a patroller, it's just rollback and a couple of basic tools that, in my opinion, should be made more available to others (the movefiles right, vandals don't ever target files anyway, so the chances of a user making an error is close to zero).
Thanks for your concerns. --Sajuuk talk | contribs | Channel 21:09, April 9, 2015 (UTC)
Voting-comment Comment – Oh Bluesonic, I'm sorry but I found your oppose quite funny, especially as I actually asked people not to oppose if it's for the reason of "You just applied for sysop and got denied, why are you obsessed in becoming a staff member?".
For a start, being a patroller is completely different to admin (as Rim pointed out), there is far less community involvement needed between the two, but I'm perfectly capable of being a patroller, having had such rights on other wiki's for years and never having issues.
Also, don't write things like you speak for the community, nobody else seems to care that I'm applying for patroller (especially as Tim RECOMMENDED I do so), so please edit your comment to make it clear you are stating your own opinion and not talking on behalf of the wiki.
I also love how you call me arrogant, that was pretty insulting and rude and I advise you to desist writing such things in the future, it makes you look like you have an issue with me. As pointed out by Starkiller, you are just writing random things for the sake of finding excuses to oppose me having additional rights, which is close to laughable. No offence. --Sajuuk talk | contribs | Channel 08:18, April 11, 2015 (UTC)
Voting-comment Comment – I just want to say, I actually recommended to Sajuuk that he should apply for a "lower" staff position first, as (as he pointed out) an Admin did on the other application, FYI Zippertrain85 (talk) 19:20, April 11, 2015 (UTC).
Voting-comment Comment – @Atvelonis: The unnecessarily confusing image policies and all the complexity involving them makes me unwilling to contribute files here. But I do have access to a script that allows me to move files to new names and automatically update that file name across articles if it's in use. On other wiki's, this is what I generally do in regards to files. --Sajuuk talk | contribs | Channel 08:07, April 12, 2015 (UTC)
Voting-comment Comment – While I remember: if I do become a patroller, I do not want the coloured name or user profile template. I would prefer not to be identifiable as a patroller at this time, but I will change my mind later in time. For the masthead, I'd like it to just say "custodian", not "patroller". They're only minor things, but I would prefer these to be honoured. --Sajuuk talk | contribs | Channel 08:53, April 12, 2015 (UTC)
Voting-comment Comment – -As I stated before, you can not set special terms for your role as patroller. We do not set up special conditions and terms for anybody. If people want rights, they need to be held to the same standards as everybody else. A strong argument for the template could be made, as that is your main page, but we are not setting up a special masthead, and the same for the yellow name. The colored name is a sign of your tools, that you are trusted enough that you will help the wiki and protect it. If people need help a colored name says this person can help, and to a vandal they see a person who will respond to their abuse. I dont understand why you would want the tools, but not be identified as somebody who has them.-Cheatcodechamp (talk) 00:39, April 15, 2015 (UTC)
Voting-comment Comment – I don't want a coloured name. I don't want to be publically identifiable as having the tools. I just want to be treated like a regular user with some additional tools, not a godhead or someone who is always rights, which is the stigma associated with a coloured name.
I have every right to request something to be removed, I requested a sysop to remove the coloured name when I was chat mod and it was granted. If a user wants you to do something, you do it, don't start questioning and rejecting people's requests, unless it's unreasonable. I don't see how requesting a different masthead and no coloured name is an unreasonable request.
I'm sorry if you don't like it, but I'm afraid it really is not your decision: the rights are being granted to me, and I have full right to request a sysop NOT to do something. Do not grant me a coloured name, I don't want it. And I absolutely refuse to believe that having a coloured name is a requirement, because it is not. --Sajuuk talk | contribs | Channel 07:58, April 15, 2015 (UTC)
Voting-comment Comment – @Sajuuk I'm not sure why this is so important. No one is going to think you're a god if you have a coloured name; the colour is just there to signify a staff position and prevent confusion. Being a patroller just means you get some extra tools, but the name part just tells people you have these tools. When people know, you can use your tools to help them. With a chat mod position, you get a star beside your name to easily signify your position, but with patroller is different. Without the coloured name, the only way people can see you're a patroller is by going to the staff list and seeing you on it, looking at the custodian users list, or with the template on your userpage, but I'm not even sure you want to have the template.
Chat mod and patroller are two different things; you automatically have a star to alert users you have the tools in the chat, but without the star people don't know. Relate that to a patroller position; the coloured name is the next best thing to a star and does pretty much the same job. People see the star and hover over it to see "Chat mod", and people click a yellow name to see a patroller template on a user's page. It's not too much too ask. This isn't a gluten or peanut allergy, no harm will come to you by having a coloured name. Timeoin has stated he disagrees with the coloured name, yet he still has it applied to his name and there is no harm done. I see that it is quite evident you'll get your patroller rights and 70% of me feels that you should have the rights because you are eligible and your attitude has improved, but it's little things like this that give me doubts. All I ask is that you don't request from having the public identification of being a patroller stripped from you, it's just there to help the community if they need to seek help from you. ☞ Rim < Talk | Updates | Edits > 08:18, April 15, 2015 (UTC)
Voting-comment Comment – You want to be treated like a regular user, but you don't get a special masthead. We ask that our staff be easy to pick out for assistance, but you don't want to do that either. Being a patroller is more then just having tools, you are there to help, and that means we need you to use the yellow. Being a part of the community means accepting the responsibility it asks of you, and from the sounds of it you are not fully committed to what you are asking for unless you get to set up special unique ground rules about how you want to be treated regular.-Cheatcodechamp (talk) 08:25, April 15, 2015 (UTC)
Voting-comment Comment – I'm not really going to argue the semantics. If you want to give me a coloured name, I'll just have to accept. Also Wulfharth, your oppose just looks funny, because it's so terribly wrong. I am not immature and I've been perfectly reasonable with everyone, have you seen me swearing or cursing people out for having a different opinion? No. I don't know what your problem is with me, but you seem to be wrong on a load of things and you should maybe work on actually editing this wiki, instead of going around degrading my contributions. You also have no right to demean user requests, I am at perfect liberty to make any requests I wish, it's not your duty to demean them. --Sajuuk talk | contribs | Channel 10:27, April 15, 2015 (UTC)
Voting-comment Comment – Hi Sajuuk, just a short message so you can see where Wulfharth is coming from with his criticism in terms of swearing/maturity: Comment link 1, link 2 and link 3. I know it's all from one thread but I just want you to get the idea of where we're coming from and take it as something constructive rather than a personal attack :) Peace out! Bluesonic1 (talk) 02:56, April 16, 2015 (UTC)
Voting-comment Comment – Well there's clearly majority support. So I don't know whether there's a time limit before this can be approved, but I don't see the value in waiting around, since the community clearly seems to support me becoming a patroller. --Sajuuk talk | contribs | Channel 11:45, April 16, 2015 (UTC)
Voting-comment Comment – It took my nomination 13 days to be completed. There's no need to rush it, applications are only open for a while so that users get their chance to vote and share their opinions, not everyone will notice it on Day 1. ☞ Rim < Talk | Updates | Edits > 23:52, April 16, 2015 (UTC)
Voting-comment Comment – @Wulfharth I should point out, Sajuuk didn't lose by majority vote, he resigned from the vote. If he hadn't, he would have won as he had the majority. Don't quote me on this, but I believe I counted 13-11. Your Brother in Arms (talk) 21:25, April 16, 2015 (UTC)
Voting-comment Comment – ^ What he said, but it's also because both Tim and CCC opposed, which made the outcome a given, so I decided that it was a fruitless effort to continue that one. Also, there's a massive majority support for me to become a patroller, with only 2 neutral's (which seem to be partial supports, based on the reasons), so I hope that Tim or CCC will grant the rights. It's been a week now, I don't see any reason why this would be rejected. --Sajuuk talk | contribs | Channel 21:42, April 16, 2015 (UTC)
Voting-comment Comment – @THALMOR The number of votes don't determine whether the user recieves the rights. The voting part is only there so that users can express their position on the application. Even a 11:3 application can be rejected if the applicant doesn't live up to the standards.
@Sajuuk I gotta agree with you, it seems quite evident the application will be approved. Still, some users might not get a chance to vote if it's closed too quickly. ☞ Rim < Talk | Updates | Edits > 23:52, April 16, 2015 (UTC)
Voting-comment Comment – That is true, but remember that your application was made just as everyone else resigned, so your application would have taken longer because we had lost a lot of sysops and the wiki was focused on getting new ones in place. In this case, there's active sysops so the application "in theory" should not take as long, but I think that everyone has said their bit. Unless someone came in with a load of alts and opposed this (which would be pretty obvious), I don't see anything stopping it being approved :P --Sajuuk talk | contribs | Channel 08:29, April 17, 2015 (UTC)
Voting-comment Comment – Shock, I do like how the most you've done in ca. 6 months is to come out of nowhere and oppose me. The funny part is that all your evidence is linked out of context, which was clearly done in a failed attempt to make me look bad in this community, despite the fact that I can probably point out how you've spammed 1000 edits in a day, complained when politely asked to contribute more than just 1000 link fixes and then called a reasonable editor request as "harassment". Then you rounded it all off by saying that you aren't an editor here, which just invalidated your entire point, which makes me suspect you were probably contacted off-wiki to simply oppose me for no reason. It shows in the reasons you've come up with. Feel free to expand your oppose reason by citing this comment pointing out the fallacy in your argument. :D --Sajuuk talk | contribs | Channel 20:37, April 17, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-comment Comment – @Shock -- opposing Sajuuk based on previous outbursts does not affect his consistency and vigilance within mainspace. While I agree granting him Administrator rights would prove disastrous, we should instead focus on his worth as a Patroller. ¢yn!k4l £@r7h (talk) 21:42, April 17, 2015 (UTC) Voting-comment Comment – I will be closing this vote shortly. Just giving folks one final chance to vote before it does close TimeoinSay G'DayView my work 03:25, April 18, 2015 (UTC)

Starkiller131Edit

Application for Starkiller131. Successful.

Starkiller131TalkContribsEdit count


Hi, everyone. My name's Starkiller131 and I've been editing since may 8th of 2013. I came by to apply for the position of patroller and will state several reasons why i believe I would make a good addition to the Staff. First off I'm active in the mainspace, I inform users when they make mistakes, and I have a better knowledge of editing then I did when I first started editing here. Just to take users back how I used used to think about being patroller. I thought being patroller would be fun and games and no response though when I was nominated by a former admin in December of 2013. The admin who nominated me wasn't aware how bad my spelling/grammar was my anger when it came to getting my edits reverted, and lack of informing any users of their edits. For a very long time I didn't believe I was even ready for patroller, and still after all this time I'm still not sure I'm ready, that decision is ultimately up to community . Now enough for history I need to talk about the current patroller situation, as of right now; we only have one patroller and another user who's close to getting rights. We need more patrollers and as of right now I'm confident in my ability as an editor, as a user, and as a member of this community that I would do my job well if given the opportunity. Thanks for reading please be honest, and don't give support/oppose without reasoning thanks. If done so the vote will not be valid :).

SupportEdit

Voting-support Support – Star has been a very good editor and is regularly contributing to the wiki. He has reverted vandalism and overall, I believe he would make a good patroller. --Sajuuk talk | contribs | Channel 15:37, April 15, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Due to his active contributions to this wiki, I think deserves consideration. Ser Pouce-a-lot (talk) 15:40, April 15, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – We all knew this day would come. We asked him for better spelling and grammar, and he delivered -- alongside a solid editing history and vigilant vandal-hunting. Promoting more Patrollers, especially one like 131, can only behoove TES Wiki. ¢yn!k4l £@r7h (talk) 17:44, April 15, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Star fits all the requirements and the basic portfolio of a Patroller. His frequent edits and managing of mistakes and violations from other users as well as reverting of vandalism by offenders is one of the most important qualities a patroller should have. His personality and attitude is quite calm and attentive, I expect him to uphold a good appearance and apply positive interactions with the community. Star is one of the best users for the job, and by my honor as the only current patroller, I fully support his application for the Patroller position. ☞ Rim < Talk | Updates | Edits > 18:54, April 15, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – I have had the pleasure to work with Star not just on this Wiki, but also on the Dark Souls Wiki, where he is also an active contributor. He is a great editor, able to catch vandalism quickly, and knows when and when not to use his tools based on the given situation. This is on top of the fact that he is an active contributor to the mainspace makes me see no reason not to promote him. In short, great guy, great editor, and great user of the XD emote. Cosmicsilver (talk) 19:27, April 15, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Star is a friendly and honest guy, so I have no issues with him being patroller. He spends a LOT of time editing, more now than ever. I've seen him revert quite a bit of bad edits, and he could definitely make use of the tools of a patroller. —Atvelonis (talk) 14:18, April 16, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Given his good editing history, regular activity, and hard work put into the wiki, he fits all the requirements. This coupled with the already existing deficit of patrollers, I say he is the patroller we need (and hopefully deserve). Your Brother in Arms (talk) 21:30, April 16, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Great guy, I think he would really make a great patroller on the Wiki. Zippertrain85 (talk) 16:17, April 18, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – I have had the pleasure of knowing him for a while now, and I have always appreciated his kind words and support, along with his editing skill. I fully recommend him for a Patroller position! --Madman97 (talk) 10:11, April 19, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support –  I personally agree to have Star to become a patroller. I have seen him on the wiki every single day, and I have seen how Star has edited and contributed to the wiki. I have seen him catch a few editing mistakes from recent edits, including a few of mine. In summary, I give Star my vote of support. Fghfghfgh510 (talk) 15:23, April 20, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Having seen not only his work editing and helping to revert bad edits, but also what the community are saying about him, I'm happy to support this nomination. TimeoinSay G'DayView my work 10:57, April 23, 2015 (UTC)

CommentsEdit

Voting-comment Comment – While I appreciate the Support Ser Pounce-a-lot. I stated in my application that in order for the vote the be valid it has to have reasoning behind it. Starkiller131 (talk) 15:44, April 15, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-comment Comment – Sorry about that. I hope the comment added is valid.Ser Pouce-a-lot (talk) 16:03, April 15, 2015 (UTC)
Voting-comment Comment – Thanks for giving a reason. I was just worried admin's wouldn't count it if it didn't have a reason. Starkiller131 (talk) 16:05, April 15, 2015 (UTC)

GaminomiconEdit

Application for Gaminomicon. Successful.

GaminomiconTalkContribsEdit count


I am applying for the position of Patroller. I feel I can do the job to the majority's satisfaction, although I'm completely unsure of what to put on this application. I'll just let my contributions speak for me and hope that a bribe of cookies will get whatever votes I may be lacking. :)

SupportEdit

Voting-support Support – -Game has not been here as long as some of us, but has made me feel old and lazy while he went out and rocked the Morrowind articles. Because of Game we have images of almost every character in Morrowind, and that is something no other wiki I have seen can say. He has also helped with the Morrowind guild and has become a voice of reason I have learned to trust and respect.-Cheatcodechamp (talk) 08:17, May 8, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Gaminomicon has shown incredible determination and skill in editing. Our Morrowind articles have been expanded at a tremendous rate largely because of Gamin, and his several thousand uploads prove that he very much cares for the wiki. He has in the past expressed interest in the rollback and the file renaming tools to clean up both his and others' edits along the road if he ever became patroller, and I am confident that he will use these tools respectfully, and that much good will come from him having them. —Atvelonis (talk) 12:09, May 8, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Gaminomicon finally went out and nominated for the patroller position? Awesome! I wholeheartedly support Gaminomicon's nomination to Patroller. He's ridiculously active on here, he's helpful and insightful, and more importantly - he is highly respected by the community. He's shown an interest in this position in the past, and I am very glad that he is finally nominating for the position. He's done such an incredible job helping to get the Morrowind pages up to par in such a very short amount of time. There are not very many editors that I can honestly say have done as much in such a short amount of time as he has. He reminds me a lot of myself back when I first started, and for quite a while now, I have seen him not only as a future staff member, but as a future administrator here, which is something that I do not say lightly. So yes - I DEFINITELY support his nomination. TimeoinSay G'DayView my work 18:13, May 8, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Due all the work he put into the Morrowind articles recently I feel he deserves consideration. Ser Pouce-a-lot (talk) 21:17, May 8, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Because of his incredible work on the images, and i'm sure that he'll be active and will help against the Vandalism and spam.Emperor Jarjarkine Aldmeri Dominion The Ragged Flagon - Cistern 01:59, May 10, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Gaminomican will do an excellent job as patroller. There has not been any real vandalism to speak of lately, so that argument seems null and void to me. He has knowlage of Morrowind that will enable him to answer questions from our community that the Mighty AzuraKnight has failed to answer in their first three minutes of existance. He has knowlage of how the nuts and bolts of the wiki's interface works, which will enable him to do repairs to edits when and where needed. More importantly, to help those like myself who are new to editing and make some mistakes in their use of the tool set. I have talked to him in chat about the objections which SuperSajuuk has raised, with Atvelonis present, and I am more than confidant that he has answered those concerns.

Here are some excerpts:

Now, I know that was all a bit of a read, and perhaps non-normative for this sort of a thing, but I wanted there to be a more in depth interveiw for some of the community members who may have had questions raised. So, I asked all of my questions, and I am more than happy with the answers that I recieved to them. This is a good move for our community. I am %100 behind it! Nomar the Nomarian (talk) 05:09, May 10, 2015 (UTC)

OpposeEdit

Voting-oppose Oppose – I'm not doing this to be an asshole to people. I'm not doing this because I'm supposedly "butthurt", as some people claim. I'm opposing Gaminomicon for patroller on the simple reason that he does not revert any vandalism or patrol new articles at all, and the only right he would make use of (out of all the rights that "patrollers" have) is the "movefiles" right. This user right should really just be made available to autoconfirmed users on the whole wiki, which Wikia can do on request, since vandals don't target the file namespace at all. Gaminomicon does a lot for the wiki and I respect him for that, but he doesn't need to be a patroller to continue his contributions and he doesn't really fit me as the kind of person who would need those additional tools. --Sajuuk talk | contribs | Channel 11:24, May 8, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-oppose Oppose – I'm gonna have to agree with spey on this one. While Gaminomicon does make great edits and has helped tremendously with images and the creation of new articles; he has shown no effort towards reverting edits, or patrolling no articles (at least from what I've seen) which are one of many duties of being a patroller. Giving all the points spey made in his oppose, I feel gaminomicon is not ready for the position of patroller and all the responsibilities that go with it. If however, he shows effort of patrolling new articles, reverting vandalism, and performing the duties that the position of patroller asks of a user; I will gladly support this, until he shows that he's capable of doing these things (which I know that he can) I gonna have to remain opposed. Starkiller131 (talk) 20:47, May 8, 2015 (UTC)

Emperor JarjarkineEdit

Application for Emperor Jarjarkine. Successful.

Emperor JarjarkineTalkContribsEdit count


I would like to become Patroller of this Wikia to help cleaning up vandalism, to help the new users and for a special task, renaming the badly named images.. I've been rollback on the biggest french wikia for 2 years or almost, so I kind of know how it works ^^ But, since we have 3 rollback working on the Activity and RC, I would work on it as well but, my principal task would be to help  Atvelonis in his work to rename the badly-named Images. I can do this correctly and i know how to do it.  I believe that this is one of the best way I could help The Elder Scrolls Wikia, for now because, i'm sure that after the little global change that will happen to me, I will be able to help over here even more. But for now, this is the best thing I can do so... Yeah here we go. Emperor Jarjarkine Aldmeri Dominion The Ragged Flagon - Cistern @fandom 00:05, May 25, 2015 (UTC)

SupportEdit

Voting-support Support – I believe Jarkine would be a brilliant patroller and see it only as making it easier for him to do good wiki work :) G0LD3NF1RE Questions Goes Here 00:12, May 25, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Is already a very trustworthy and friendly member of the community, who helps out a lot all over the wiki, in mainspace and all. Above all, he would benefit a lot from the Patroller abilities, which I think is a very overlooked thing when looking for staff. Couldn't support more. (talk) 22:28, May 25, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – I completely agree with what ^the others said. EJ is a helpful, dedicative, meticulous, and very friendly staff. I trully believe that he'll do a great job on being our beloved wiki's patroller :)  Hbxn (talk) 20:45, May 26, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – If this wiki had a few more like our Jarkine we'd be set. His qualities and extreme value to us should be obvious to everyone. —This unsigned comment is by Gaminomicon (talkcontribs) . Please sign your posts with ~~~~!

Voting-support SupportEmperor Jarjarkine has proven to be very helpful, and is a friendly face to the community. Patrolling is a job not to be underestimated and we can use the extra help for sure. — Flightmare @fandom (talk) 12:58, May 28, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Jarjarkine has been more then just a member of this community, he has been an advisor and friend. He truly loves the wiki and his recent achievement of becoming a helper proves this. I am proud to support this, as i know he supports the wiki.-Cheatcodechamp (talk) 07:05, June 1, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – I agree with the general support everyone is giving. Jarjarkine has proven he can be a good patroller and a responsible user. ☞ Rim < Talk | Updates | Edits > 17:41, June 1, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Jarjar is certified as a dedicated dude, not only to his main wikis, the french ones, but also to this one, outside his zone of comfort. Also, I feel like "I kinda know how to do it" is rather unflattering, because, considering what I've seen, "I really f**in know how to do it" would seem more adequate. —Sky Above,Voice Within · Show thy Voice! 19:39, June 2, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – For reasons pretty much all stated above. Jarjar is a great guy, he's friendly and helpful and is very dedicated to the wiki. He has shown to be responsible and full of good ideas, his recent work setting up the Guilds being one example. Overall I think Jarjar would be a great choice for Patroller. —Atvelonis (talk) 01:03, June 4, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Good user, I think he can do lots of good for this wiki Zippertrain85 (talk) 22:54, June 9, 2015 (UTC)

CommentsEdit

Voting-comment Comment – CCC, your comment showcases you don't actually understand what the Wikia Helpers group is for. It is a group of users who help Wikia to increase the non-English communities on the network. They're not helpers for all wiki's, just the non-English communities and as Jarjarkine is a native French speaker, his helper duties only extend to French communities. To use his rights here, he must have local flags, or he would be interfering in the community: just like how Wikia Staff do not interfere in local wiki's unless it's for TOU violations. Just thought I'd put that out there, to clear up misconceptions. --Sajuuk talk | contribs | Channel 13:37, June 1, 2015 (UTC)

Ser Pouce-a-lotEdit

Application for Ser Pouce-a-lot. Successful.

Ser Pouce-a-lotTalkContribsEdit count

Hello everyone. I am applying for a patroller position. I don't really know what to say here, so I'll just mention some of the contributions I have made. I may have only been an active contributor since March, but have been quite active since when i started out by adding bugs templates to many articles. A few of my other contributions include, but not limited to, adding missing word wall tables to a few Dragon Shout articles, creating articles for Morrowind such as the Propylon Index articles, and created navboxes for Morrowind Thieves Guild quests, and Morag Tong quests. I also reverted any vandalized articles I've come across. For the reasons mentioned I feel that I could make a suitable patroller. Anyway, i guess that's all. Ser Pouce-a-lot (talk) 17:14, June 25, 2015 (UTC)

SupportEdit

Voting-support Support – Ser Pouce is an excellent editor, he has been a colossal help with the wiki, adding the bugs template to pages, adding quest journals, tables, new Morrowind articles, the list goes on and on. He reverts a significant amount of vandalism and reports it as well, and I believe he could make a lot of use of the tools of a patroller. Good luck Ser Pouce! —Atvelonis (talk) 21:15, June 25, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – - A great editor, extremly active, and he's often revoking some vandalism. Almost everydays he revert some crappy edits made by vandals.  So of course i support ! Emperor Jarjarkine Aldmeri Dominion The Ragged Flagon - Cistern @fandom 21:17, June 25, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – I see him help a lot of people. :D ℛℯɲɀӼѴᶅ Ancient traveler&#039;s skull ← ᴛᴀʟᴋ 21:19, June 25, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – An excellent of what a patroller should be, frequent, helpful, and works with absolute quality. (talk) 18:21, June 26, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – -I say yes, good idea and I support it fully.-Cheatcodechamp (talk) 19:14, June 27, 2015 (UTC)

ShockstormEdit

Application for Shockstorm. Successful.
Notice: Shockstorm initially withdrew his application due to a temporary real-life incident but got the position soon afterwards.

ShockstormTalkContribsEdit count


ShockstormEdit

ShockstormTalkContribsEdit count

It was suggested I run since we could use some more patrollers. I believe I'd be an asset in regards to editing, moving pages and images, reverting vandalism, and helping other users. I've worked on various projects on the wiki, like interwiki linking and stub fixing. I've also given encouragement to people who need help or have been inactive - I believe small things like that are important in building up the wiki and retaining editors. Application withdrawn

SupportEdit

Voting-support Support – Only half of our patroller force is currently active and while that may change eventually it really doesn't hurt to have one more extremely active user as staff. If you take a look at Shockstorm's contributions you'll see that much of what he does involves polishing up and protecting the mainspace. He has proven without a doubt to be an excellent editor and I am certain that if he gets the position he will uphold the duties of a patroller very well. —Atvelonis (talk) 19:04, November 8, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Full support for this one, Shockstorm has dedication to this wiki that can rival past Administrators, he seems to know what he's doing especially with links categories and things of that nature. I imagine the Custidian tools and Rollback would be much helpful for any work he does on the Wiki. Zippertrain85 (talk) 19:44, November 8, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Before shock made this application, I had said in chat we needed more patrollers and I wasn't lying. As atv said we only have two active patrollers, I believe that giving rollback to shock would be beneficial to this wiki as a whole. Starkiller131 (talk) 23:18, November 8, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – - About time you applied, this will do nothing but help the wiki. I am more then happy to support this.-Cheatcodechamp (talk) 01:58, November 10, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – He is a very active contributor who has been with this wiki for quite a while. He has my support. The Cat Master (talk) 17:48, November 10, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – I've definitely seen Shock all over the wiki helping out. It seems only fitting to make Shock a patroller, and that I've seen, Shock has contributed a lot to articles Ottoman Hold (talk) 13:04, November 16, 2015 (UTC)

OpposeEdit

Voting-oppose Oppose – Sorry to be that guy... Shockstorm has certainly helped out this wiki, and has thousands of edits to his name, but the problem here is that so many of those edits were tiny little things of little significance. Of course those edits helped us out, but at the same time a patroller is supposed to be about so much more than making lots of little edits. Also, he has a history of just clearing up, leaving the wiki without notice for a while, and then coming back. Yes, that is allowed, but a staff member should have more consistent attendance. Emperor Maximus (talk) 19:32, November 16, 2015 (UTC)

CommentsEdit

Voting-comment Comment – Despite my support, I do have some questions that should be cleared. Even though Shock is usually well behaved, I think if he does gain Patroller rights he could be less defensive when people question his edits, since sometimes those situations do get overblown. Another thing is that Shock also has a habit of randomly leaving the Wiki completely for months on end, if he does get Patroller I would prefer he have less sporadic editing patterns. Overall, support, but still. :P Zippertrain85 (talk) 19:43, November 8, 2015 (UTC)

Voting-comment Comment – My position on the matter is irrelevant regardless as Shock decided to withdraw his application. I would however like to note that some of the people voting support are saying that only half the patroller team is currently active, and while I am inactive due to being in a psych ward, I will make a full return in 1 - 2 weeks. I think we should archive this application in the time being since the creator has decided to pull out on becoming a patroller. ☞ Rim < Talk | Updates | Edits > 03:15, November 20, 2015 (UTC)

BronkiinEdit

Application for Bronkiin. Successful.

BronkiinTalkContribsEdit count

I finally bow into JarJar's pressure and apply!! With the wiki expanding at the rate it is, I feel it is important that we maintain a full and active staff. I feel I can add to that. My edits have been diverse enough to give me experience in many areas of the wiki, and I am familiar with undoing vandalism and using VIP. There have been times where I feel I would have benefited from rollback. In conjuction with Atv, I often scour through recent edits looking for improvements, which comes close to the work of a patroller. I feel I am well prepared. Perhaps most importantly, I am willing and able to commit the time to help improve the wiki through this role in the long run. Thanks for reading! Bronkiin (talk) 03:16, January 14, 2016 (UTC)

SupportEdit

Voting-support Support – I think Bron would be a perfect patroller. He isn't scared to enforce any rules, and he cares about the wiki (the eleven thousand edits was one of the things that gave that impression for me). He keeps an eye on the recent edits and always reverts any vandalism, and I've seen him help out in a bunch of other things greatly. I see no reason why he shouldn't be a patroller, and I'm surprised it took him this long to ask. ;) --╰( ° ͜ʖ ͡°)つ──☆ *:・゚ || Kora Stormblade || Talk!

Voting-support Support – In the few months he has been here, since starting out by adding a ton of high quality images to ESO pages, he has proven to be a very dedicated editor. He has my vote :) The Cat Master (talk) 04:02, January 14, 2016 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – I was waiting for this, as I thought it would come eventually. With his contributions and helping out, it felt like Bronkiin was already a patroller. I say we give him the good ol' rollback. Ottoman Hold (talk) 04:12, January 14, 2016 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Has done a ton of work on ESO stuff (and helps with other things as well) in the short time he's been here. Also is quite active in reverting vandalism. Although I'm wary of fancy tea-sipping Bosmer in general, I'm inclined to make an exception in this case. --Shockstorm (talk) 04:26, January 14, 2016 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – I think it's quite clear that Bronkiin should be patroller. I would attempt to write a few paragraphs as to why, but ^^Those great folks above me basicly did that for me :P . Seriously though, Bron should be patroller. The_CrusaderTalkpage05:07:36_January 14, 2016

Voting-support Support – I have no doubts in Bronkiin's editing abilities. He's added thousands of pages and images, and is constantly working to improve various other things on the wiki. Hell, he's made well over two thousand edits just since the 1st. I see him checking new edits and reverting vandalism on a regular basis and it's clear that he really knows what he's doing. He's very capable himself, yet he also recognizes how important collaboration is to building up the wiki, so he's on chat talking and working with other people all the time. Overall Bronkiin is both an excellent editor and member of the community, and I am very confident in him becoming patroller. —Atvelonis (talk) 20:20, January 14, 2016 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Bron has been active in not only editing, but the community from the beginning. Now that we passed most of our policy problems and we are focusing on editing, Bron should be great help in that regard. He can improve in many ways, but he can do what we need of him. I wish him luck in this new venture.-Cheatcodechamp (talk) 18:10, January 18, 2016 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – While always drunk, bronk has shown himself as being one of the great users this wikia actually has. This can be seen by his edits (incredibly high spamming-level of edit :3 ) or by the way he talks to other users of thiswikia, caring about thems. He also patrolls the the RC/WA everydays, revertings the vandals, wich is obviously a good point for someone who want's to be patroller hehehe but anyway, Bron's a great, really friendly member of this wiki, and active, who really deserves becoming member of the wiki's staff.Emperor Jarjarkine (chat with meh) 22:30, January 18, 2016 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – How did I not already vote on this? No idea. Anyways ... I don't always vote on applications, but when I do, I drink Heineken... and also vote Bron. (Seriously though - he's definitely someone we need as patroller - he edits everything, fixes mistakes, etc. I could go on, but its already been stated above. TimeoinSay G'DayView my work 22:02, January 23, 2016 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – He's done a lot of editing and generally helped the wiki grow. He also seems to care about the trolls that want to mess up the work that has been done here. I see no problem with him being a patroller. Fluffyzerglin

The Crusader of TruthEdit

Nomination for The Crusader of Truth. Unsuccessful.

Nominee: The Crusader of TruthTalkContribsEdit count

Nominator: Ned1230TalkContribsEdit count


Hey guys, I don't know if it's quite allowed, but as I can't find a rule against nomination in the rulebook, I'm nominating Crusader for patroller. Within the past year, it is obvious to me that he has done quite a lot for the wiki. At least over 5 or 6k edits (Or, in Crusader's case, 12k), a good knowledge of wikitext, and an eye for bad edits and the ability to fix them - this is what patrollers should be. Crusader has all of these qualities. I'm honestly surprised that he isn't a patroller already. He's also a good chap, and he's never been unfair or mean to anybody as far as I can tell. Stated plainly, he's a prime candidate.

Ned Tp- Contribs 21:42, March 10, 2016 (UTC)

OpposeEdit

  • Voting-oppose Oppose – I do not believe he is ready. He has said himself that he "works small". His edits are almost exclusively minor maintenance edits. I want to see him working on adding content and checking recent changes. He has shown that he is in fact unsure what edits should and should not stand. That is a huge, huge problem for any candidate for patroller. I have had to undo some of his reverts, which seem rushed and uncertain. Otto is more ready; Otto is not ready. CoT is not ready. Bronkiin (talk) 22:59, March 10, 2016 (UTC)
  • Voting-oppose Oppose – I have a very high opinion of Crusader, but there are still a lot of formatting things he needs to perfect. There are a huge number of small rules and styles that a patroller needs to be absolutely certain of that can only be learned through experience working with them, and I don't think Crusader's reached that point yet. He has been editing a lot for the past several months, but most of those edits have been simple and minor, such as links, ID template edits, <br />, etc., so his experience overall has been relatively limited. Only fairly recently has he branched out and been doing any patroller-type edits, and as Bronkiin mentioned he is still adapting to that. I would like to see Crusader as patroller at some point but I don't think right now is the best time. —Atvelonis (talk) 04:06, March 11, 2016 (UTC)
  • Voting-oppose Oppose – I'm too tired to write out my reasons but honestly Bron explained it all for me. The reasons he stated already I agree with as well. -Kora Stormblade (talk) 03:51, March 11, 2016 (UTC)
  • Voting-oppose Oppose – I only oppose Crusader at this moment. In due time, I believe he will be ready. At present, though, he makes a lot of mistakes. While he has a lot of edits and a good attitude, he doesn't really fit the bill right now. He doesn't preview/check his edits much, and the majority of edits are just fixes and not adding information. I oppose at this moment. Ottoman Hold Message Me My Action 02:44:55 March 12, 2016
  • Voting-oppose Oppose – Yeah, I'm gonna change my vote. I had a brain fart and he doesn't even wanna be one yet, because he doesn't think he's ready. Quite respectable of him, and also I don't want to keep supporting my mistake. Ned Tp- Contribs 14:20, March 16, 2016 (UTC)

CommentsEdit

  • Voting-comment Comment – You really should ask him first. Bronkiin (talk) 22:11, March 10, 2016 (UTC)
  • Voting-comment Comment – Yeah I kinda get that now, I think I jumped off a building that I thought was a couple steps, as per usual with me when I'm tired at the end of the day (Mid-day crisis). If I'm outta my mind, well, that's between me and my mind. Ned Tp- Contribs 14:40, March 11, 2016 (UTC)

Kora StormbladeEdit

Application for Kora Stormblade. Successful.

Kora StormbladeTalkContribsEdit count


I am applying to be a patroller, and feel that I am qualified and able enough for the position. I revert and report any vandalism I see, and I take the time to check through the recent edits to find anything that can be fixed or added onto, as well as marking any spam pages I see for deletion, and adding categories on images/pages that I come across that need them.

I am very consistent in how active I am and have been here on the wiki, and have been active on the Recent Changes/Mainspace/Chat for some time now. I understand how to edit, and what things I don't know yet I will be very willing and able to learn quickly. I have also helped a few other users who have had trouble with editing or had questions, and have let some know of any mistakes they may be making if they are severe enough. I believe that becoming a patroller may give me more tools that I can use to make more useful edits, and, as we have only 3 at the moment, I believe I could help out and have the work be distributed more to make things easier for them. And lastly, I will be committed to giving the time and effort required to take on such a responsibility.

SupportEdit

Voting-support Support –  Kora is a consistent user of the Wiki and has an excellent grasp on editing. She is by far the most active vandal-remover/reporter and is a frequent editor. This, combined with the willingness to use the Wiki and her effort, earns her my support vote. EthanFriend03 (talk) 07:49, July 25, 2016 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – I was actually wondering if you will apply. She has probaby been more active in patroller duty than us patrollers recently. she has been with us for about a year now, is dedicated to the mainspace of the wiki, and she has a good grasp of editing. Therefore she has my support. The Cat Master (talk) 22:06, July 24, 2016 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Kora has shown that she's more than competent of being a patroller. She knows her way around editing, page formatting and policies. She'll no doubt make for a great patroller. CarloV3r (talk) 22:01, July 24, 2016 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Shows the commitment to edit frequently. Very conscientious and the most frequent remover of vandalism. Competent and learns fast. She'd make good use of the tools available. Keeps very close tabs on RC and will make a great patroller. xx Bronkiin (talk) 22:08, July 24, 2016 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – More than qualified, I have no doubts she'd do very well as a patroller. Like others have said, she's very active in reverting vandalism and checking recent edits in general. --Shockstorm (talk) 22:40, July 24, 2016 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Kora Stormblade is more than qualified for the position of Patroller. She is constantly editing the pages on the look out for vandals, and with already being a Chat Moderator she has proven she can handle the tools and pressures of being staff. I say, why not upgrade her to a Patroller! :) Zippertrain85 (talk) 23:02, July 24, 2016 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Kora would make an excellent patroller. She's been watching over Recent Changes very closely for a while, and has over a year of experience on the wiki. She reverts vandalism on a daily basis and consistently proves her skills in looking over new edits and also tagging poor-quality images as such. I'm positive that she will be a great patroller. —Atvelonis (talk) 23:33, July 24, 2016 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Kora is an excellent moderator, and I'd like to think she would make an excellent patroller. I personally believe she is more than qualified for it, so I support. TAOA 00:46, July 25, 2016 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – we need more patrollers so yup here's my vote Blitzbear93 (talk) 00:58, July 25, 2016 (UTC)Blitzbear93

Voting-support Support – Kora is more than qualified. She has been actively editing for a while now. Also she has helped out Crusader with many edits. She knows how to edit and has taught me some editing tricks in the past. She also a while back helped me out on a large editing project that I still value her for toady. So yeah, IMO she is more than qualified to be a patroller. Qahnaarin1997 (talk) 03:08, July 25, 2016 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Kora is beyond qualified, as many others have already stated. She is very active and stays on top of everything going on. She will be a great asset in this field and deserve it. User:~*LilithRayn*~(User talk:~*LilithRayn*~)

Voting-support Support – I know I'm not very active here, and could still be considered new, but I would still like to throw in my support vote. I usually keep the Recent Changes page pulled up, auto-refreshing every minute, and I frequently see Kora "patrolling" pages. She's very active and would make a great choice for a Patroller. — TheDefiant604 (talk • contribs) 04:39, July 25, 2016 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – What they said! I usually write the longest reasons whenever I vote but look at all of those supports.

RenzXVI // Talk  // Chat // 14:01, Mon 25 July 2016 (UTC) 

Voting-support Support – There's alot of things I could say about Korra....First, she's named after the second serie of the best show in the world ever to be created (Avatar the legend of Korra) and the fact that she's really active both on the chat and on the wikia, she's a really good friend like at least 50 other folks (if ya know what a mean lel). I think it's gonna be an asset to have her in the Patroller group so, go ahead and promote her alreadyyy !--Emperor Jarjarkine (chat with meh)@fandom 17:03, July 25, 2016 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – There isn't much to say, everyone has already said it so yea. DarkVaultBoi111 (talk) 23:26, July 27, 2016 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Kora is always helpful. Recently, she has stepped up her editing, and I believe she can now fit the role of patroller. Just don't abandon chat on us Kora ;) Ottoman Hold Message Me My Action 12:46:57 July 27, 2016

Voting-support Support – Kora is more than suited for becoming patroller. She's been keeping up the recent changes a lot (from what I've seen.) She's becoming an active editor, at least from what I've seen when I've actually been here. I might not even be really kinda qualified to vote since I'm never here this time of year (rhyme not intended) but Kora has the makings for a good patroller. Hopefully she'll continue to edit the wiki thousands of times more actively than I currently am. The_CrusaderTalkpage03:55:01 July 31, 2016_

Voting-support Support – kora edits a lot, so she seems fit for the job. Ashley (talk) 15:58, August 1, 2016 (UTC)

CarloV3rEdit

Application for CarloV3r. Successful.

CarloV3rTalkContribsEdit count


Hey everyone,

I’d like to apply for the job of patroller. I personally think I’m qualified for the job, and here’s why;

Since I became active on the mainspace I’ve been trying to help out as much as I can. I’ve added about 40% of all Morrowind armor and item images, added all the images on the Merchandise page, and have recently been working on adding audio files to every Oblivion NPC article (in which I’ve made a lot of progress).

I mark images as poor quality whenever I come across them, I categorize images, revert vandalism, and give articles up for deletion when necessary. I check most to every edit I see, and adjust them if they lack in content/coding. I think I’ve shown that I’m active on both the Activity Feed and the Mainspace in general, as well as the Chat. Whenever I come across several incorrect edits, I notify the user of his/her errors, and advise him/her on how to do it correctly, as well as directing him/her to our policies.

I’ve shown that I know how to edit, that I can be consistent in how active I am, and that I’m overall an asset to our wiki. I’ve talked to several people, and I’ve got a clear view of what a patroller’s duties are.

I think I’ll be an asset to the Patroller team, and I’ll sure try to be. I’ll be committed to the job and spend as much time as I can doing it. I’m positive that I’ll be able to handle the responsibility. Furthermore, I’d also like to add that it would be very practical to have a patroller in my time zone, as most of the current patrollers aren’t online when I am. Therefore we’ll be able to keep up a consistent patrolling system, without any holes.

SupportEdit

Voting-support Support – Carlo has shown repeatedly that he is capable of looking over edits and fixing information/reverting vandalism, keeping file licensing up to snuff, adding lots of content to the wiki, helping new users out, and overall being an outstanding member of the community. Additionally, his timezone gives us a significant boost in terms of looking over recent edits. I have no doubt that he will make an excellent patroller. —Atvelonis (talk) 15:29, August 16, 2016 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Carlo has been one of the best mods during my time here, and I know he will make a excellent patroller. He has been friendly, extremely active, and has helped a lot of people with editing. He is most certainly qualified, with over 3000 edits, and is bound to make more. TAoA 15:34, August 16, 2016 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – To me Carlo is the perfect example of something good coming out of /d. As of recent pretty active on ns:0 as well as /d and accomplished so many things in this small period of time. We can always use good patrollers and I think he will be a good asset. — Flightmare @fandom (talk) 16:39, August 16, 2016 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – There is not much I can say that hasn't been said already. He would make a great addition to our team. The Cat Master (talk) 17:01, August 16, 2016 (UTC)

Voting-support SupportAgentOfMara (talk) 17:14, August 16, 2016 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – He's a great editor, a great discussions mod (as far as I know), and a great moderator on the chat. So, i see no reason why he shouldn't get the tools that will help him edit. Starkiller131 (talk) 17:34, August 16, 2016 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Carlos is very hardworking and diligent, as his people are known for. --Shockstorm (talk) 17:48, August 16, 2016 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – When I first saw CarloV, I was a bit confuse, I saw no nominations/applications from him and yet, he had a Star on the chat, so, since he was a mod for the app, I didn't know if he'd be a good mod or not, you'll tell me, he cannot be worse than that guy...But, after seeing him continuously moderate the chat, dealing with every single problem of the chat and sometimes of the wikia itself, i grew really proud of our wikia to have such a good addition to the team ! If it was only that tho, he proves every days that he cares for the wiki itself as he reverts, reports and do all kind of stuff one without right would do to patroll the wiki and he does it extremly well ! There's much more I could say but, let's just stick to that: He's one of our best users out there and he's a really friendly guy as well so, giving him more right would do only good to us ! Get on with it ! --Emperor Jarjarkine (chat with meh)@fandom 18:34, August 16, 2016 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Carlo has been working very hard and more than deserves this position. He has been, and will continue to be, a great asset to this community. ~*LilithRayn*~ talk21:13, August 16, 2016 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – I do... ;-) Once again, another application has overwhelming support, there's nothing else left to say here. XD

RenzXVI // Talk  // Chat // 06:48, Wed 17 August 2016 (UTC) 

Voting-support Support – Absolutely. From what I've seen, Carlo is as capable as he is competent. I think that he will make a fine addition to the ranks of Patroller. Time and time again he has shown that he's mature and sensible, both in chat and within the wiki itself.

100% yes from me.Gunrilla talk 08:56, August 17, 2016 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – For all the same reasons stated above (theres nothing more I can add that hasn't already been said) Blitzbear93 (talk) 09:28, August 17, 2016 (UTC)Blitzbear93

Voting-support Support – Carlo has shown he can preform patroller duties such as monitoring recent edits and so on. Too bad though, we'll lose a good moderator. Ottoman Hold Message Me My Action 02:19:42 August 22, 2016

Voting-support Support – I have seen Carlo working tirelessly as a Moderator. I trust that he is professional and knows what he is doing. He has edited many articles and knows editing quite well, I'm sure. Good luck Carlo. You have my support. Harald Bluetooth Gormsson (talk) 16:12, August 23, 2016 (UTC)

OpposeEdit

NeutralEdit

CommentsEdit

The Crusader of TruthEdit

Application for The Crusader of Truth. Successful.

The Crusader of TruthTalkContribsEdit count

I would like to nominate myself for patroller. With The Cat Master becoming an administrator, the wiki needs another user to become a patroller in his place. I believe I am qualified to become patroller because I do all of the tasks a patroller does already: I watch the recent changes, and check every edit that I can, I report vandalism to the TES:VIP page, and I have proven that I can politely guide other users, in both helping them learn how to edit and to help show them the Wiki's policies. I've proven myself active in both chat and the recent changes. Whenever asked to assist a user, I have always done so, provided it was in my capacity to do so and it was beneficial for the wiki.

I've shown myself able to edit almost everything, from adding item pages from Daggerfall, to making sure pages are correctly formatted, to adding interwiki links, adding audio files and pictures, creating redirects, adding categories, managing disambiguation pages, writing lore articles, and to managing a large amount of templates, along with more.

I've definitely shown that I can be a decent patroller for the wiki, and I hope that you all can say the same. The Crusader of Truth (talkchat) 19:01, September 2, 2017 (UTC)

SupportEdit

Voting-support Support – Fully support, and glad that he has finally applied. He is more than able to perform the duties required of a patroller, and has been very helpful for helping revert vandalism and making consistently good edits, of a wide variety especially. Very willing to help out and take criticism, and has been here a good while while also showing a constant rate of improvement. I believe he is more than capable to handle patroller responsibilities well. —Kora Stormblade (talk) 19:07, September 2, 2017 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – This is a very good application, and he has proved himself more than ready to become a patroller. Last time Crusader applied, I came to the conclusion he wasn't quite ready. This time, he is more than ready and most certainly over-qualified for the role. Technically, he is our most advanced community member other than Flight, and in this respect he will be a very valuable addition to the staff. After almost two years he is a very experienced editor and a familiar face around the community. With Cat Master's recent promotion (for lack of a better word), I believe Crusader is ideally suited to fill the Patroller gap. — Bronkiin (talk) 19:10, September 2, 2017 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – He has proven himself to be a diligent editor and would make an excellent patroller. The Cat Master (talk) 19:37, September 2, 2017 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – First off, it's about time he applied. Second I vote support. Edits a lot. Knows how to edit and revert/reports to VIP. Qahnaarin1997 (talk) 01:09, September 3, 2017 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Crusader has proven through a wide variety of edits that he's ready to become a patroller. I'm convinced he's improved himself since his previous application, and will make a great addition to the staff.—CarloV3r (talk) 09:33, September 3, 2017 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Excellent editor and very knowledgeable. --Rupuzioks (talk) 10:02, September 3, 2017 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – crus edits a lot and he knows the wiki well. he's definitely qualified to be a patroller. Ashley (talk) 20:26, September 3, 2017 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – He's a very good editor, reports vandals, and tries to help users with their problems. He's also a MUCH better at templates then he was back then. Now he can teach new users about this template XD. In conclusion and it's already been said, he's essentially a patroller without the rights and that lovely color. Starkiller131 (talk) 01:16, September 4, 2017 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Crusader has been editing for a couple years now and has steadily become more proficient over that period. In recent days he has done an especially good job with maintenance, formatting, and reverting vandalism. He will certainly make good use of the patroller tools when granted them. —Atvelonis (talk) 16:52, September 4, 2017 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – I've been waiting for Crusader to re-apply for quite some time now as it is quite apparent he would make a damn fine patroller. He's learnt a lot in the past two years since his last application, and with his constant activity and considerable experience on the wiki, I can without a doubt say he is ready for a promotion. The Rim of the Sky (talk) 23:35, September 4, 2017 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Crusader has certainly grown a lot as an editor since the last nomination/application. He certainly has monitored recent changes and such, and reports vandalism all the time. He's basically a patroller without the rights, so he might as well get what he's earned. Ottoman Hold Message Me My Action 07:17:44 September 05, 2017

OpposeEdit

NeutralEdit

CommentsEdit

RoztyEdit

Application for Rozty. Successful.

RoztyTalkContribsEdit count

Hello everyone, I would like to apply for the position of patroller. After spending a while editing here, I believe I am qualified to handle such a role in the wiki. I have added content in a number of different pages, and am familiar with the style and formatting guidelines in place for them. I have been always keeping a close eye on the Recent Changes, and I am able to respond to vandalism that might have gone unnoticed by reverting it and reporting it to the VIP page. Using the tools provided for the patrollers, I will be able to do this even more efficiently.

I have also been editing different types of pages, and am familiar with the proper style for articles of different games and topics, as well as various templates and infoboxes. My edits are of a wide variety, as I do not focus on just adding only one type of content, so I am confident that I am able to quickly adjust any changes made by less experienced users, as well as easily recognize vandalism.

My activity has also remained pretty consistent, and I have not gone long without checking the latest changes in the RC. Moreover, I have guided users before, and have shown to be able to handle cases like these without any problems, being able to remain calm when the situation called for it. I am very active on the wiki's discord server as well, and can respond very quickly to any user problem when the need arises.

Because of these reasons, I feel that I am capable of handling the position.

SupportEdit

Voting-support Support – Rozty has been doing a great job with Recent Changes these past few months, and I've seen her become more and more proficient at catching vandalism and other non-desirable edits. She has a solid understanding of wiki policies and the style and formatting guidelines, and has done a good job talking to new users when they make errors. She's engaged with the community, particularly on the wiki's Discord server, but also with the moots and on the Discussions. The wiki is in need of some more patrollers right now, and I feel that Rozty is more than qualified for the position. —Atvelonis (talk) 00:18, August 5, 2018 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – A very competent editor without a doubt, and generally very friendly to users. Not only competent, but also very active. Doesn't back down from projects that are/were a pain to complete, and is shown to be more than capable just in general. Total support from me. —Blademaster Jauffre (talk) 00:23, August 5, 2018 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – I have seen a lot of her edits that were focused on formating or reverting vandalism, especially on the pages that appear on Recent Changes. She is also one of the most frequent contributors to the VIP page. I am sure that Rozty is worthy of this promotion and it would benefit the wikia. TinyClayMan (talk) 00:28, August 5, 2018 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – There isn't much i can say about her that hasn't been said already. With that said she has my support. The Cat Master (talk) 00:57, August 5, 2018 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Rozty's editing abilities are spot on, to the point that she's corrected me a few times. She certainly patrols the RC already, so the tools would only further her ability to edit and contribute. Ottoman Hold Message Me My Action 01:38:39 August 05, 2018

Voting-support Support – Definitely does a better job than I do. Supporting for all the above. – The Crusader of Truth (talkchat) 02:55, August 5, 2018 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Everything is said above, definitely support. --Rupuzioks (talk) 06:19, August 5, 2018 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – In my half-arsed attempts to find recent vandals on RC, Rozty to my frustration has normally got there first. Note "half-arsed". We also need to someone to carry the patroller team. Rozty has been doing this admirably (thank you) without the rights, but its about time the proper tools were given for the job. Best of luck — Bronkiin (talk) 08:44, August 5, 2018 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – I refrained from voting until now because I'm not that active in the mainspace and I though that my vote wouldn't be that relevant, but I think that Rozty diserves all my support for all the effort she has put into improving the wiki. For this reason, I would like to support her application. Amulet of Kings (talk) 22:03, August 11, 2018 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Rozty is extremely well at editing and corrects my errors whenever I make them. She is truly involved in the wiki and deserves the very best. CatholicPrincess15 (talk) 05:41, August 14, 2018 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – I believe this user can be a patroller. MrRiddle0 (talk) 14:57, August 14, 2018 (UTC)

OpposeEdit

NeutralEdit

CommentsEdit

Re-evals of patrollersEdit

Balagog gro-NolobEdit

Nomination for Balagog gro-Nolob. Unsuccessful.

Balagog gro-NolobTalkContribsEdit count

Existing patroller —EbonySkyrim Message! 21:48, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

OpposeEdit

Voting-oppose Oppose – Nolob isn't really active here anymore. And while he's done many things great around the wiki in the past. He, really hasn't done anything in a while. if, he ever get's active in the future than he may get his position back, but until then. I'm gonna Oppose Starkiller131 (talk) 00:43, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-oppose Oppose – Nolob hasn't really been that active. Patrollers need to be more active to stay in their position. --Greeno200 (talk) 02:59, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-oppose Oppose – Never around, just comes back once a month to keep his rights, does not revert anything. Most of his recent edits are in CT's to oppose changes to improve the wiki. Doesn't even do anything in regards to the "custodian" tools, this has to be an unequivocal oppose. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page | Tabber Code | Channel 08:35, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-oppose Oppose – Has shown no activity since a month ago, August 11. And those were on the consensus board. His last edit on the mainspace was July 25. He should be considered inactive and therefore lose his rights. Talos guide you Kinsmen Speak Citizen! 11:38, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-oppose Oppose – Balagog's lack of interest in the wiki has been noticed a long time ago. If CCC managed to return, Balagog could too. But he didn't. So, I don't think he needs his tools anymore. —Sky Above,Voice Within · Show thy Voice! 19:14, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-oppose Oppose – Based off of what Harold has said, I think I should oppose, these inactive users are pointless, and we shouldn't let them keep there rights if they aren't going to use them, Balagog is still on Wikia, but just doesn't edit here. —Walter White Walker Say My Name 00:50, September 12, 2014 (UTC)

NeutralEdit

Voting-neutral Neutral – Balagog seems like a good guy & a good patroller, my only concern is he isn't really around that often, but overall I don't think he should lose his position so I'm neutral at this point. Ȼǿᵰᵮẽᵲ ₲ħǿśᵵ Ⱥᵰᵾᵬĭᵴ Đẽẽᵭᵴ 00:15, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-neutral Neutral – Balagog was a good editor in the past but just isn't really active anymore. So I'm neutral — Fire Wolf Pup Talk> <Contributions 03:44, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-neutral Neutral – Balagog has been a great contributer in the past and more active. As of now he's not as active but I'm not sure if he should be demoted at this stage. —EbonySkyrim Message! 20:38, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-neutral Neutral – Balagog has been somewhat inactive lately, however, if they come back again to regularly editing and patrolling, they have my support. (Everyone needs a break every once in a while). At worst, I believe they should be moved to inactive. TimeoinSay G'DayView my work 11:04, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

CheatcodechampEdit

Nomination for Cheatcodechamp. Successful.

CheatcodechampTalkContribsEdit count

Existing patroller —EbonySkyrim Message! 21:48, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

SupportEdit

Voting-support Support – Seems to be making a come back, acts nice, I think he does the duties well enough. —Walter White Walker Say My Name 22:46, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – CCC is a good patroller who makes good edits & reverts vandalism when he sees it, he appears to have returned to this wiki & I believe he does a good job here. Ȼǿᵰᵮẽᵲ ₲ħǿśᵵ Ⱥᵰᵾᵬĭᵴ Đẽẽᵭᵴ 00:15, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Even though he came back only recently, he's been hard at work to improve the Oblivion articles. He's clearly back for the count so this is most definate a support. Starkiller131 (talk) 00:43, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – He is an active Patroller who has helped the wiki. He deserves to stay in his position. --Greeno200 (talk) 02:59, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – He is active, makes good edits, and is making a good comeback. He has my support — Fire Wolf Pup Talk> <Contributions 03:44, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Is making a slow return and reverts some vandalism / bad edits. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page | Tabber Code | Channel 08:35, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – CCC is again active and are doing what is necessary to stay as a patroller. —EbonySkyrim Message! 20:38, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Yeah I've seen him around the articles as of late, nearly all the time I check he's somewhere in the "recent edits" --[̲̅$̲̅(̲̅ ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°̲̅)̲̅$̲̅] "Get Vehkt M8" -CHIM Shady [̲̅$̲̅(̲̅ ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°̲̅)̲̅$̲̅] (talk) 23:04, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – CCC is very active on here, and continues to have my support, as they always has had. TimeoinSay G'DayView my work 10:55, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Triple C has returned to the wiki recently, and his work speaks for itself. At this rate, I do even think he's suitable for admin, if only he extended his work to the forums and chat. —Sky Above,Voice Within · Show thy Voice! 19:16, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

Fire Wolf PupEdit

Nomination for Fire Wolf Pup. Successful.

Fire Wolf PupTalkContribsEdit count

Existing patroller —EbonySkyrim Message! 21:48, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

SupportEdit

Voting-support Support – FWP makes a lot of good edits, & reverts vandalism when she sees it, has been helping out a lot lately with Daggerfall pages she deserves to remain a Patroller. Ȼǿᵰᵮẽᵲ ₲ħǿśᵵ Ⱥᵰᵾᵬĭᵴ Đẽẽᵭᵴ 00:15, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Fire is a great editor,and reports vandalism and removes bad edits. So, she's got my support.

Voting-support Support – Per others.--Emperor Jarjarkine Aldmeri Dominion Senate Hall 02:12, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – After being neutral at first, I have decided to support Fire Wolf Pup. I was mistaken when I said she hasn't been active, as I looked and saw she has been contributing a lot recently and in the past on this wiki. --Greeno200 (talk) 04:18, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – FWP has done a good job lately and is very active, but I would like to see her do a little more of the patrollers duties. —EbonySkyrim Message! 20:38, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – FWP continues to have my support in her job as a Patroller. TimeoinSay G'DayView my work 10:58, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – An entire year passed and Fire still continues her wiki agenda, and she helped the wiki a lot, both recently and in 'ancient times'. She deserves the yellow's every shade. —Sky Above,Voice Within · Show thy Voice! 19:17, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – This user is more than fit for being a patroller, I've changed my vote because I've seen the user helping the wiki regularly. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page | Tabber Code | Channel 08:52, September 12, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Actually, she has been working hard, and has been editing well. She does deserves the Tools if you ask me :) —Walter White Walker Say My Name 01:54, September 13, 2014 (UTC)

NeutralEdit

Voting-neutral Neutral – She might be active, but I hardly see her name crop up on the activity feed. If I seen her name more often, I'd be more likely to support, but I have to be neutral at this point. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page | Tabber Code | Channel 08:35, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

CommentEdit

Voting-comment Comment – Greeno, I don't really understand what you mean my "active". It's just that by looking at my contributions, you can tell that I've peen pretty active for the past few weeks. Sorry if I came of as a little bit rude, I didn't mean it. :P — Fire Wolf Pup Talk> <Contributions 03:44, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-comment Comment – The curse of living in Australia - people forget we live in a different time zone. TimeoinSay G'DayView my work 10:58, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

FlugsmithEdit

Nomination for Flugsmith. Unsuccessful.

FlugsmithTalkContribsEdit count

Existing patroller —EbonySkyrim Message! 21:48, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

OpposeEdit

Voting-oppose Oppose – Very inactive as of late. Perhaps if he could prove he can make a comeback, this post might be re-given to him. ℳ.Ѻẘεᾔ.ℒℱC Say Hi! stalk edits 23:27, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-oppose Oppose – Unlike some of the other chat mods Flug hasn't edited enough to have tje position. He also, hasn't reverted vandalism or anything of that nature. He even admitted in chat, that he has lost his will to edit on this wiki anymore. Starkiller131 (talk) 00:43, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-oppose Oppose – He hasn't been very active lately as a Patroller. He has done great things for the wiki however if he isn't very active now I'm afraid I have to oppose him. --Greeno200 (talk) 02:59, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-oppose Oppose – Does nothing as a patroller. He mainly posts in CT's and randomly comes to chat, but does nothing that warrants him to continue keeping the rollback and custodian flags. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page | Tabber Code | Channel 08:35, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-oppose Oppose – Not active in the mainspace, his last edit in the mainspace was in July 17. All his edits after that were on consensus boards. He should be considered inactive and lose his rights. Talos guide you Kinsmen Speak Citizen! 11:41, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-oppose Oppose – Flug's activity has faded to nonexistence for some time now. Like Balagog, his tools don't do much good right now. —Sky Above,Voice Within · Show thy Voice! 19:19, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

NeutralEdit

Voting-neutral Neutral – Flugsmith is an awesome user, and a great Patroller, but has almost gone completely off the Mainspace recently, which makes me not really want to support. —Walter White Walker Say My Name 22:46, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-neutral Neutral – Flugsmith was a great Patroller for the time he was active, but he has been inactive as of late for the most part & so I'm neutral at this point. Ȼǿᵰᵮẽᵲ ₲ħǿśᵵ Ⱥᵰᵾᵬĭᵴ Đẽẽᵭᵴ 00:15, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-neutral Neutral – Flugsmith was a great editor but his activity as dropped significantly. So I'm going to go neutral. — Fire Wolf Pup Talk> <Contributions 03:44, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-neutral Neutral – I know Flugsmith has been more inactive than active lately, I would like to hear more from him before I make a decision. —EbonySkyrim Message! 21:34, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-neutral Neutral – I agree with Ebony and Ghost here on this one - they are inactive currently, but should this change, and they continue to edit like they had in the past, they will have my support. TimeoinSay G'DayView my work 11:01, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

Ghost AnubisEdit

Nomination for Ghost Anubis. Successful.

Ghost AnubisTalkContribsEdit count

Existing patroller —EbonySkyrim Message! 21:48, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

SupportEdit

Voting-support Support – Ghost is great at this, he actively edits the pages, reverts vandalism and bad edits often, is helping editors with policies and whatnot. I think he is one of the best here, so I definitely support him keeping it!

Voting-support Support – For obvious reasons Starkiller131 (talk) 00:43, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – per others.Emperor Jarjarkine Aldmeri Dominion Senate Hall 02:11, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – He has been one of the most active editors on the wiki lately, he has my support. --Greeno200 (talk) 02:59, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Ghost is a good friend and one of the best editors we have on the wiki. He is always reverting vandalism and reverting bad edits. He has my full support. — Fire Wolf Pup Talk> <Contributions 03:44, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Best user on the wiki, there is no reason to kick him out. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page | Tabber Code | Channel 08:35, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Ghost has done and are doing a great job for this wiki, not only patrolling new articles, cleaning up, creating new articles, reporting vandalism, guiding users to the necessary guidelines. He has also monitored the chat when he has had the time and is eforcing the rules. He has shown a real dedication to this wiki to make it better. —EbonySkyrim Message! 20:38, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Ghost is one of the guys pulling the mainspace (especially Morrowind's section) out of the dirt, he left twice because of drama but hopefully these re-evaluations will put a stop to said drama. --[̲̅$̲̅(̲̅ ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°̲̅)̲̅$̲̅] "Get Vehkt M8" -CHIM Shady [̲̅$̲̅(̲̅ ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°̲̅)̲̅$̲̅] (talk) 22:59, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Pretty much what everyone has already said. In fact, I think Ghost should actually be promoted to Administrator. (Which is a different thread altogether). TimeoinSay G'DayView my work 11:07, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Does a very good job at Morrowind and Oblivion articles as well as at patrolling. He is also very helpful and nice. Serve Akatosh or serve no one. (talk) 12:53, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Ghost has become a very important member of the community, despite his relatively frequent ragequits (yes, those do annoy me that much). Like others have said, he's adequate for an admin nomination. —Sky Above,Voice Within · Show thy Voice! 19:22, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

NeutralEdit

Voting-neutral Neutral – Anubis and I have discussed the situation, he has apologized. We had a nice civil debate in the chat. He agreed that he didn't handle the situation as he should have. Therefore I am retracting my opposition and changing my vote to neutral, so it is the same as before when I didn't vote. Anubis does seem like a good guy and I wanted say that the incident between us has been settled. Talos guide you Kinsmen Speak Citizen! 01:03, September 13, 2014 (UTC)

CommentEdit

Voting-comment Comment – While I may not be part of the active community, I have been around here lately (due to Dutch Tes-wiki business). I was previously active on the tes-mods community as well, and have met Anubis there a couple of times before. He always appeared to be someone who meant the best for everyone, taking a neutral position between different parties. I know this hasn't got to do much with being a patroller, but nevertheless it's an important aspect for anyone that gets tools in any community to get along with the others. He's also one of the few people that I noticed to be active (alongside EbonySkyrim and a few others, of course), which I think shows of an interest in this wiki that some other people might lack. I could add a few more things, but I'll just leave this here. Sincerely, Yaell Novella (talk) 06:58, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-comment Comment – I'm torn on my vote. Ghost does his job, but I literally just sat through a whole days worth of arguing over his need to hold RPers below him in worth. It was disgusting, and incredibly hostile. Jacen Veron (talk) 08:23, September 13, 2014 (UTC)

MHInfEdit

Nomination for MHInf. Unsuccessful.

MHInfTalkContribsEdit count

Existing patroller —EbonySkyrim Message! 21:48, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

OpposeEdit

Voting-oppose Oppose – Had left the wiki and is thus, inactive. ℳ.Ѻẘεᾔ.ℒℱC Say Hi! stalk edits 23:28, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-oppose Oppose – MHif Tried to resign one day, but that never came through. Either the admin ignored it, or didn't see it. He, also isn't active never really edits. Or do anything that his job requires of him Starkiller131 (talk) 00:43, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-oppose Oppose – Isn't very active at all, rarely edits, never see him revert vandalism, I don't think he should remain a Patroller. Ȼǿᵰᵮẽᵲ ₲ħǿśᵵ Ⱥᵰᵾᵬĭᵴ Đẽẽᵭᵴ 00:15, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-oppose Oppose – He isn't active hardly at all now. The wiki needs active Patrollers. --Greeno200 (talk) 02:59, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-oppose Oppose – He isn't really active at all now. — Fire Wolf Pup Talk> <Contributions 03:44, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-oppose Oppose – Does nothing, has apparently left the wiki. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page | Tabber Code | Channel 08:35, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-oppose Oppose – If MHInf already have left the wiki, I see no objection for him to be demoted. —EbonySkyrim Message! 20:38, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-oppose Oppose – MH has executed the duties for a relatively short period of time, just to fade into inacivity soon after. His edits proved valuable back then, but the issue here is that "back then" is a long time from now. —Sky Above,Voice Within · Show thy Voice! 19:23, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-oppose Oppose – Totally agree with the other opposes —Walter White Walker Say My Name 03:21, September 13, 2014 (UTC)

NeutralEdit

Voting-neutral Neutral – -While he is rarly here, and has few edits in the past few weeks. I can't call him inactive yet. A few people say he quit, but I have not found anything saying that. If he did say he was done, then I guess he is done.-Cheatcodechamp (talk) 05:15, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-neutral Neutral – I agree with Cheatcodechamp - I haven't seen anywhere whe it says that they've quit, and its a little too early to say that they're inactive, as it has only been a short while. As their lack of activity is the only real issue - I believe if they come back, they should be reinstated. TimeoinSay G'DayView my work 11:10, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-neutral Neutral – He hasn't had any activity since August 30. While this is sooner than Flug and Balagog he still hasn't shown activity. A patroller's duty is to look over the mainspace, and for that he can't be semi-active. Though unlike the other two inactive patrollers he still has a chance to make a comeback, as 30 days haven't passed since his last edit. Talos guide you Kinsmen Speak Citizen! 11:47, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

CommentEdit

Voting-comment Comment – MH has tried resigning back in March, as seen here. I don't know if he reconsidered it, but I just felt like providing this here. —Sky Above,Voice Within · Show thy Voice! 02:49, September 13, 2014 (UTC)

Sky Above,Voice WithinEdit

Nomination for Sky Above,Voice Within. Successful.

Sky Above,Voice WithinTalkContribsEdit count

Existing patroller —EbonySkyrim Message! 21:48, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

SupportEdit

Voting-support Support – Though his editing has dropped, he still goes on the Mainspace sometimes and has shown he knows how to use the tools and help users with issues, so I support! —Walter White Walker Say My Name 22:46, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Sky is a great Patroller who knows the policies well, reverts vandalism or bad edits when he sees them, is an approachable user & helps newer users with editing problems they face. Ȼǿᵰᵮẽᵲ ₲ħǿśᵵ Ⱥᵰᵾᵬĭᵴ Đẽẽᵭᵴ 00:15, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Agreed with everything said above. Sky, is still active still helps out new user, and still reverts and reports Vandalism so this is a clear support.

Voting-support Support – he's my master, he's my guide, he is the one i think is the one who should really keep his right. He is good at editing, he can help you at anythime, and he really is cool.--Emperor Jarjarkine Aldmeri Dominion Senate Hall 02:09, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Sky is a very helpful Patroller. He gives advice to new and inexperienced editors and edits a lot himself. He is overall a great user on the Elder Scrolls wiki. --Greeno200 (talk) 13:47, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Sky is a great editor and still makes great edits. He has my support. — Fire Wolf Pup Talk> <Contributions 03:44, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – While he doesn't edit much in the mainspace, he reverts vandalism daily and is an overall great user to have on the wiki. No reason to oppose Sky. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page | Tabber Code | Channel 08:35, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Sky has done a lot in the past, but is still editing and reporting vandalism. No reason for demoting him. —EbonySkyrim Message! 20:38, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – SAVW is one of the most active mods here, and has always done his job well. So yes I of course support him. --[̲̅$̲̅(̲̅ ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°̲̅)̲̅$̲̅] "Get Vehkt M8" -CHIM Shady [̲̅$̲̅(̲̅ ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°̲̅)̲̅$̲̅] (talk) 23:09, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – For reasons having already been stated - Sky has my support. They are helpful and supportive, and fix a number of vandalism issues. Sky would have my support to continue doing this as an administrator, if they chose to do so. TimeoinSay G'DayView my work 11:14, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – Sky surely deserves to keep his job as a patroller. He is very helpful, nice, active and does everything a patroller should. Serve Akatosh or serve no one. (talk) 12:51, September 11, 2014 (UTC)