Hey shockstorm, would you mind conducting an interview with me? We need more content for the Facebook page. If you agree, I will leave the questions here. Answer them to the best of your ability and copy/paste the questions and answers over to my talk page. Good day. --Madman97 (talk) 17:50, April 17, 2016 (UTC)
Portable Infobox check Edit
Hello! I'm Isaac, and I'm representing our Portability Initiative here at Wikia. I know that we've talked with you a bit about your ongoing migration, and I was checking in to see if we could help this process on your community. I know that you're doing much of it yourself, but I also wanted to offer assistance if you were swamped with other foci. We'd really like to get working on your community, but we need your go-ahead. Also, if you have any questions, or this is the wrong venue for this kind of a discussion, please let me know. Thanks! FishTank (wall) 01:42, April 18, 2016 (UTC)
Hey shock - small favour to ask. when you're adding pages for The Elder Scrolls: Legends, is it possible to add a reference to where the information came from. It'll make it a heck of a lot easier for us to work out what is "officially" released info, and what is NDA stuff. (At this stage, the beta isnt up, so everything is from somewhere, but its better to be prepared now :) Timeoin•Say G'Day•View my work 19:27, April 22, 2016 (UTC)
- err... yeah, you are. Sorry - saw your name on a bunch of Legends pages, and thought you were adding them. (I need more sleep lol). And I realised that a bit later, oops. I sent a message to him as well about it. Its not a major drama - but its something that we'll need to be on-point for later on when the beta comes out - because breaching NDA stuff is how we get our website into serious hot water down the track - if not from Bethesda themselves, but from the fans.
But as long as its referenced, it is completely fine to have pre-released content up on our website. (Its our defence to the argument we're breaching NDA if we aren't) :D Timeoin•Say G'Day•View my work 19:41, April 22, 2016 (UTC)
And its just an idea - I think we should have a pre-load template for the enemy decks or something similar. For example, you run into things such as Wolves, Goblins, etc, which are enemy decks in their own right. (The decks will consist of types of Goblins and Wolves, more than likely, but this is just an example - others I've seen from the screenshots on the legends website include Daedric Cultists, and other more sophisticated sets). what do you think? Timeoin•Say G'Day•View my work 21:19, April 22, 2016 (UTC)
Hey Shock, mind joining chat for a second or two? Thanks.
Legends Races Edit
They're referred to on the part of the card that holds their race. Other cards shown so far interact with the race on the card, so listing out the races as they appear on the cards has a mechanical purpose. Yumyum36 (talk) 19:51, April 29, 2016 (UTC)
Re: Top LinksEdit
Hey, I just got your messages about those stupid things. I had to take a bit of a break for a couple days. Anywho, i read that link that Renz showed you, and i can't really make out exactly what they are trying to accomplish, except possibly to annoy people with another one of their hair brained ideas. (remember the flags?) At least i know that we have to put up with that nonsense for a bit longer. The Cat Master (talk) 07:11, May 2, 2016 (UTC)
Both ways Edit
It has nothing to do with my behavior, Bronkiin provokes. I had already tried solving it on his talkpage but he didn't listen. So I went to Atvel, because I know how it would've went if I tried to argue with Bronkiin about it. And no, I didn't try to get him in trouble, I tried to keep an entirely legit edit, nothing else. If I tried to get him in trouble, I would've said something like Bronkiin's page says he's away yet he came back or Bronkiin refuses to keep my legitimate edit, remove his patroller status or something like that, but I didn't do that. I merely tried to keep a completely legitimate edit there.